You are viewing a past event. Ticket sales and paper submissions are closed.

Program

The preliminary program of the 40th AFFI conference has been published. Click here to download it in PDF version or use the schedule below.

Full program schedule

08:30 - 08:45
Welcome Speech learn more
Welcome Speech
Room: Amphi Pierre Mauroy
08:45 - 10:45
Parallel Sessions I learn more
AI and Finance
Room: Room 501
Chair: Donatien Hainaut (UCLouvain)
Algorithmic vs. Human Portfolio Choice
Presenter: Béatrice BOULU-RESHEF (Université d'Orléans, LEO)
Authors: Béatrice BOULU-RESHEF (Université d'Orléans, LEO), Alexis Direr (Université d'Orléans, LEO), Nicole von Wilczur (Ayolab)
Discussant: Hoang Hiep Nguyen (IGR-IAE Rennes, University of Rennes)
Abstract: Robo-advisors that provide investment advice online on the basis of risk profiling questionnaires have recently made a breakthrough in the investment management industry. The validity and reliability of these questionnaires is crucial as profiling inaccuracies can lead to a mismatch between investment proposals and retail investors’ preferences. This paper uses data from a robo-advisor that makes portfolio recommendations to its potential users and lets them choose their risk exposure after having received this recommendation. Comprehensive information about savers’ characteristics allows us to investigate how the robo-advisor’s algorithm maps questionnaire’s answers into recommendations and to what extent users follow or deviate from the recommendation. The results provide evidence that risk profiles recommended by the robo-advisor are qualitatively aligned with financial portfolio theory. Although a variety of information is used by the algorithm, the recommendation is heavily based on answers about financial risk taking. A large majority of users follow the recommendation and as a result are also strongly influenced by their declared propensity to take financial risk. Factors influencing the recommendation like age, financial wealth and short-term liquidity needs are downplayed by savers. Factors not exploited by the algorithm like saving’s goals or professional occupation impact investors’ portfolio choice. Gender, although not taken into account by the algorithm, still influences savers’ choice after controlling for a wealth of potential confoundings.
Comparative Analysis of Tree-Based techniques and Neural Networks in Pricing a Barrier Options
Presenter: Mohammed AHNOUCH (Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne)
Authors: Mohammed AHNOUCH (Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne), Erwan Le Saout (Erwan.Le-Saout@univ-paris1.fr)
Discussant: Béatrice BOULU-RESHEF (Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orléans,Université d'Orléans)
Abstract: This study investigates the pricing of down-and-in put options, crucial in the complex derivatives domain, such as autocallables, highlighting their sensitivity to skew and autocorrelation which limits the efficacy of flat volatility pricing for accurate valuation and risk management. Initially examining their risk profiles, particularly through vanna and volga, the study progresses to assess the proficiency of machine learning and deep learning in pricing. A thorough comparative analysis offers insights into the application of AI in the pricing of derivatives and equity-linked annuities.
Pollution concerns as predictors of bankruptcy and financial distress: An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Modelling
Presenter: Hoang Hiep Nguyen (Université de Rennes and CREM)
Authors: Hoang Hiep Nguyen (Université de Rennes and CREM), Jean-Laurent Viviani (Université de Rennes and CREM), Sami Ben Jabeur (UCLy (Lyon Catholic University), ESDES, Lyon, France), Paul Vigneron (Univ. Paris-Pantheon-Assas, LARGEPA, Paris, France )
Discussant: Donatien Hainaut (UCLouvain)
Abstract: This study delves into the integration of environmental variables within financial risk assessment. Through the analysis of data from 1,265 French firms from 2003 to 2020, we illustrate how environmental factors can enhance the predictive accuracy of some machine learning models for financial distress prediction. Employing SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations), we additionally offer insights into their influence on these bankruptcy prediction models. Notably, our research represents a pioneering endeavor in utilizing the quantity of pollution emissions (mass of substances) stemming from industrial installations, contributing to air, soil, and water pollution, as an innovative indicator of environmental performance. This novel approach serves to emphasize the significance of diverse variables in assessing a firm’s environmental performance within bankruptcy and financial distress prediction.
Valuation of guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (GMAB) with physics inspired neural networks
Presenter: Donatien Hainaut (UCLouvain)
Authors: Donatien Hainaut (UCLouvain)
Discussant: Mohammed AHNOUCH (Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne)
Abstract: Guaranteed Minimum Accumulation Benefits (GMAB) are retirement savings vehicles that protect the policyholder against downside market risk. This article proposes a valuation method for these contracts based on physics-inspired neural networks (PINNs), in the presence of multiple financial and biometric risk factors. A PINN integrates principles from physics into its learning process to enhance its efficiency in solving complex problems. In this article, the driving principle is the Feynman-Kac (FK) equation, which is a partial differential equation (PDE) governing the GMAB price in an arbitrage-free market. In our context, the FK PDE depends on multiple variables and is difficult to solve using classical finite difference approximations. In comparison, PINNs constitute an efficient alternative that can evaluate GMABs with various specifications without the need for retraining. To illustrate this, we consider a market with four risk factors. We first derive a closed-form expression for the GMAB that serves as a benchmark for the PINN. Next, we propose a scaled version of the FK equation that we solve using a PINN. Pricing errors are analyzed in a numerical illustration.
Banking and financial intermediation I
Room: Room 502
Chair: Paolo MAZZA (IESEG School of Management)
Do Risky Banks Pay Their Employees More?
Presenter: Laurent Weill (University of Strasbourg)
Authors: Laetitia Lepetit (University of Limoges), Frank Strobel (University of Birmingham), Laurent Weill (University of Strasbourg)
Discussant: Romain Oberson (IESEG School of Management)
Abstract: This study investigates the relationship between bank risk and employee wage compensation using a comprehensive dataset from U.S. commercial banks spanning 1990 to 2022. Our key finding reveals a nonlinear association in the form of an inverted U-shape: higher bank risk initially leads to increased wage compensation, but beyond a certain threshold, this effect reverses. We interpret this pattern as a trade-off between risk and salary: higher risk necessitates higher compensation to mitigate bankruptcy risk for employees, but higher compensation through higher costs can hamper the bank's existence. This relationship is more pronounced in small banks and favorable economic conditions and when bank concentration is low.
MACROPRUDENTIAL POLICY AND CORPORATE LOANS
Presenter: Christophe Godlewski (University of Strasbourg)
Authors: Christophe Godlewski (University of Strasbourg), Małgorzata Olszak (University of Warsaw)
Discussant: Paolo MAZZA (IESEG School of Management)
Abstract: Abstract We analyze the impact of macroprudential policies on corporate loans. We utilize a dataset of over 4,800 syndicated loans from 1999-2017, matched with detailed macroprudential policy data from the European Central Bank. We investigate how overall policy stance and specific tools influence key loan terms at origination, including the amount, maturity, collateral, and covenants. Drawing upon hypotheses related to credit growth, risk-taking, and efficiency transmission channels, we show that a tighter macroprudential policy leads to an increase in loan amounts and collateralization. These effects are most prominent for tools that tighten lending standards and capital buffers, particularly in domestic credit markets. Additionally, we provide insights into the influence of loan, borrower, and lender characteristics on the impact of macroprudential policy on loan terms. Our findings offer novel empirical evidence of macroprudential transmission occurring through risk-shifting and compensating behaviors in private debt markets.
Attractivity, Rentability: The Strategy of the Lead Lender in the Syndicated Loan Market
Presenter: Paolo MAZZA (IESEG School of Management)
Authors: Aurore Burietz (IESEG School of Management), Takeharu Sogo (SKEMA Business School), Paolo MAZZA (IESEG School of Management)
Discussant: Christophe Godlewski (University of Strasbourg)
Abstract: In a syndicated loan, being the lead lender increases the costly production of information and the costly monitoring process, which can however be mitigated with significant expertise and/or a relationship with the borrower. In this paper, we test whether the lead lender takes advantage of its strategic position to be more attractive, lowering loan costs, or to extract additional rent from the borrower when submitting its loan offer during the pre-mandate phase of the syndication process. We use the auction theory to develop a stylized model that we empirically test using data from LPC Dealscan. Interestingly, we show that past relationships as well as the geographical proximity between the lead and the borrower contribute to reduce loan costs, while the lead industrial expertise is associated with an increase in these costs, in line with the hold-up theory.
The Interaction between Prudential and Accounting Regulation for Expected Credit Losses: Insights from IFRS 9
Presenter: Romain Oberson (IESEG School of Management)
Authors: Romain Oberson (IESEG School of Management), Minyue Dong (University of Lausanne), Nicolas Rudolf (University of Lausanne)
Discussant: Laurent Weill (University of Strasbourg)
Abstract: We analyze the informativeness of regulatory adjustments to banks’ regulatory capital to account for expected credit losses that are not captured by accounting provisions. Our research design exploits that only a subset of banks is subject to these regulatory adjustments during our sample period, while the adoption of IFRS 9 made it mandatory for all banks to build up loan loss provisions for expected losses. Our results suggest that regulatory adjustments provide information about banks’ accounting and risk-taking behavior, revealing that these adjustments are not solely reflecting a preference of the supervisor for more conservative provisions. After IFRS 9 adoption, we observe a pronounced decrease in the magnitude of regulatory adjustments reflecting the harmonization between regulatory and accounting frameworks for expected losses. Concurrently, the informativeness of the remaining regulatory adjustments about banks’ accounting quality and risk increases. Our study highlights the importance of understanding the interaction between prudential and accounting regulation when designing future policies.
Central banking, and financial stability
Room: Room 503
Chair: Matthieu Picault (Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orléans, Université d'Orléans)
Evaluating Inflation Forecasts in the Euro Area and the Role of the ECB
Presenter: Francesco Roccazzella (IESEG School of Management)
Authors: Francesco Roccazzella (IESEG School of Management), Bertrand Candelon (UCLouvain)
Discussant: Djeneba DRAME (EconomiX, CNRS, University of Paris Nanterre)
Abstract: We use optimal combination of forecasts to introduce a novel forecast encompassing test to evaluate time-series and institutional inflation projections in the euro area. Combination weights reveal that the ECB was the most informative forecaster before the recent inflation surge. However, its weight declined over time, approaching zero in 2022. Macro-financial conditions (uncertainty, the difference between the current and 2% inflation target, and the loosening of the monetary policy) explain this dynamics.
Do firms react to monetary policy in developing countries?
Presenter: Djeneba DRAME (EconomiX, CNRS, University of Paris Nanterre)
Authors: Djeneba DRAME (EconomiX, CNRS, University of Paris Nanterre)
Discussant: Matthieu Picault (Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orléans, Université d'Orléans)
Abstract: The debate on the effectiveness of monetary policy in developing countries remains open. We shed a new light on this issue by examining whether managers' perceptions of financial constraints are shaped after a change in monetary policy. The analysis, based on a sample of 28,906 firms in 63 developing countries (177 events), shows that managers are more likely to report increased financial constraints following a policy rate increase only when the change is sufficiently large (more than 150 basis points). Interestingly, this adjustment is symmetric for both tightening and easing. Moreover, our results suggest that the most sensitive firms are those with a previous credit relationships and those operating in countries with independent central banks and less liquid banks. Finally, we show that monetary policy affects not only perceptions but also firms' decisions to apply for credit.
Toward a New Central Banking: An Augmented Green Taylor Rule
Authors: Abdoulkarim Idi Cheffou (ISG international Business School), Fredj Jawadi (IAE Lille University School of Management), Philippe Rozin (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Discussant: Francesco Roccazzella (IESEG)
Inflation Expectations, Sovereign Bond Yields and Media Sentiment on the ECB in Four European Countries
Presenter: Matthieu Picault (Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orléans)
Authors: Wiem Ghazouani (Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orléans), Matthieu Picault (Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orléans)
Discussant: Philippe Rozin (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Abstract: With 20 countries and 24 languages, the Euro Area presents a unique communication challenge to the European Central Bank especially when countries’ inflation diverge. Using a unique dataset of more than 200 000 press articles from 28 journals in 4 countries between 2020 and 2023, we study how the media coverage of the ECB monetary policy varies across the Euro Area by studying both the volume of articles published and the content of the articles. To analyze the sentiment conveyed by the different articles in a multi-language corpus, we rely on both lexicon approach and deep learning Natural Language Processing models to improve the comparability of our quantitative measures. Using the newly released data from the Consumer Expectation Survey, we discuss how the information content of press articles on monetary policy can influence both households inflation expectations and the dynamic and sovereign bonds yields. Using a panel dataset with country specific inflation expectations from both professional and households, macroeconomic control variables and fixed effects, we show that the tonality of the media can significantly influence households inflation expectations between 2020 and 2023.
Financial Markets and Environmental Strategies
Room: Room 505
Chair: Guillaume Coqueret (EMLYON Business School)
Sustainable commodity factors
Presenter: Guillaume Coqueret (EMLYON Business School)
Authors: Guillaume Coqueret (EMLYON Business School), Bertrand Tavin (EMLYON Business School), Yuxin Zhou (Université Lyon 2)
Discussant: David Ardia (HEC Montreal)
Abstract: We craft green-minus-brown (GMB) portfolios of metal and agricultural futures based on their environmental footprint, namely greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption. We find little evidence that sustainability is priced in the cross-sections of commodities: our GMB factors have small average returns and negligible alphas. We however document substantial benefits when including green (long) commodity portfolios to diversify equity and bond allocations. The annualized risk-adjusted performance can be increased by up to 27% when the commodity pocket accounts for 20% of the composition. With regard to environmental impact, portfolios composed of metal futures have much larger raw footprint compared to agricultural goods. Still, carbon-driven metal indices have more potential for intensity reduction.
Environmental Performance and Financial Resilience to the Covid-19 Crisis: International Evidence
Presenter: Brice Foulon (Université Clermont-Auvergne)
Authors: Brice Foulon (Université Clermont-Auvergne)
Discussant: Guillaume Coqueret (EMLYON Business School)
Abstract: Abstract This study brings a new perspective on the relationship between environmental performance (EP) and financial resilience by empirically considering two outcomes of resilience: stability and flexibility. Using data from financial markets and environmental performance reporting to study the financial resilience of a sample of 6,663 companies worldwide to the wild card Covid-19 crisis, it reports that while EP and its constituents are predominantly associated with a longer and less likely recovery from the loss, environmental innovation and emissions reduction helped firms by reducing the severity of their loss in the period immediately following the crisis. These results imply that the relationship between EP and resilience is not straightforward and depends heavily on the context of the resilience process, informing both managers and investors about the synergies and tradeoff between EP constituents and resilience. This study extends our theoretical understanding of both the global financial consequences of the pandemic and how EP affects the resilience process.
Navigating Environmental Regulations through M&As
Presenter: Fangming Xu (University of Bristol)
Authors: Xi Wang (Beijing Institute of Technology), Fangming Xu (University of Bristol), Yeqin Zeng (Durham University)
Discussant: Brice Foulon (Université Clermont-Auvergne)
Abstract: Do environmental regulations affect firms’ acquisition strategies? We find that following the implementation of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), Chinese public firms in ETS-compliant regions are more inclined to acquire firms in non-compliant regions. This inclination is more pronounced among firms with higher product market competition, weaker CSR performance, more financial constraints, and less media attention. We also find that acquirers tend to take over firms in the same industry but subject to less stringent environmental regulations. This strategic target selection results in positive announcement returns for mergers and acquisitions (M&A) but exerts a crowding-out effect on corporate innovation. Our findings reveal that firms subject to stringent environmental regulations strategically evade these regulations by re-locating production through M&As. Our study supports recent calls for policymakers to coordinate environmental policies across different regions to address the potential relocation of corporate carbon emissions.
Liquidity Premia and Bid-Ask Spreads: Evidence from 94 Years in the U.S. Stock Market
Presenter: David Ardia (HEC Montréal)
Authors: David Ardia (HEC Montréal), Emanuele Guidotti (USI Lugano), Tim Kroencke (FHNW School of Business)
Discussant: Fangming Xu
Abstract: This paper examines liquidity premia where liquidity is measured by effective bid-ask spreads. We find that the liquidity premium accounts for 20% of the total equity premium, and the price of illiquidity has remained stable over almost one century. Liquidity is more strongly priced in January but also significant in non-January months. Our results suggest that liquidity is priced across all stocks, although samples restricted to larger stocks may lack power and achieve lower statistical significance. Stocks with higher spreads are associated with lower prices of illiquidity and higher liquidity premia. Finally, we link bid-ask spreads to Amihud’s illiquidity measure.
Corporate finance I
Room: Room 506
Chair: Tim Loughran (Notre Dame)
What do the accounts of agricultural cooperatives say about their returns to members?
Presenter: Geoffroy Enjolras (CERAG, Université Grenoble Alpes)
Authors: Geoffroy Enjolras (CERAG, Université Grenoble Alpes), Charlotte Disle (CERAG, Université Grenoble Alpes), Rémi Janin (CERAG, Université Grenoble Alpes)
Discussant: Nuria Suárez (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)
How are the tax evasion savings distributed?
Presenter: Vincent TENA (Université Paris Dauphine - PSL)
Authors: Vincent TENA (Université Paris Dauphine - PSL), Juan Imbet (Université Paris Dauphine - PSL), Marcelo Ortiz (Pompeu Fabra)
Discussant: Geoffroy Enjolras (CERAG, Université Grenoble Alpes)
Abstract: We use a continuous-time moral hazard model in which a firm owner contracts an agent to reduce corporate tax expenses in an institutional setting with random audits by tax authorities. The model distinguishes between legal tax avoidance, characterized by a lack of audit risk yet persistent moral hazard, and illegal tax evasion, which introduces audit risk and contingent penalties in the event of detection. We show that a relevant fraction of the savings are paid to the manager in charge of the tax strategy, and how different institutional features influence this fraction, the intensity of tax evasion over time, and the overall tax revenue collection. Further, we show that the optimal contract for tax evasion generates a corporate Laffer curve in a setting without investment and managerial cash diversion.
Corporate opacity and debt structure in the shadow of investor sentiment
Presenter: Nuria Suárez (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)
Authors: Nuria Suárez (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid), Elena Ferrer (Public University of Navarre)
Discussant: Tim Loughran (Notre Dame)
Abstract: This study examines the effect of firm opacity on debt growth and how investor sentiment shapes this relationship. Using an international sample of 4,678 firms during 2005-2019, we find that firm opacity negatively influences the growth in both bank and total debt ratios. This negative effect is more relevant during periods of high investor sentiment than it is during periods of low investor sentiment. Additionally, the role of investor sentiment is more prominent for firms with a lower proportion of bank ownership. Moreover, the joint effect of firm opacity and investor sentiment in reducing corporate debt growth is more relevant in countries with more developed institutions and greater creditor rights protection. Our main results hold after addressing potential endogeneity concerns and after several robustness checks.
How Managers Communicate about Capital Budgeting to Investors
Presenter: Tim Loughran (Notre Dame)
Authors: Robert Battalio (University of Notre Dame), Tim Loughran (Notre Dame), Bill McDonald (Notre Dame)
Discussant: Vincent TENA (Université Paris Dauphine - PSL)
Abstract: We create a lexicon of 44 capital budgeting terms and document manager language usage in earnings conference calls over the years 2010-2020. Managers often use technical language like cash flow, free cash flow, capital spending, return on investment, and return on capital during conference calls. We substantiate the survey evidence of Graham and Harvey (2001) by demonstrating that managers actually use concepts like payback period and ROI in conference calls. We find that managers mention the non-GAAP term EBITDA significantly more often when a company’s net income is negative. Capital budgeting counts are associated with larger capitalization, higher fixed assets, lower R&D intensity, and negative net income firms.
11:15 - 12:30
Keynote Speaker learn more
Prof. David Thesmar
Prof. David Thesmar (MIT) - The Effects of Mandatory Profit-Sharing on Workers and Firms: Evidence from France
Room: Amphi Pierre Mauroy
13:30 - 15:30
Parallel Sessions II learn more
Asset pricing and risk premia
Room: Room 501
Chair: Paul Karehnke (ESCP Business School)
Do Limits to Arbitrage Explain Portfolio Gains from Asset Mispricing?
Presenter: Nathan Lassance (UCLouvain)
Authors: Alberto Martin-Utrera (Iowa State University), Nathan Lassance (UCLouvain)
Discussant: Paul Karehnke (ESCP Business School)
Abstract: The efficient frontier varies across regimes with different levels of investor sentiment. In particular, its slope is influenced by the role that sentiment has on the tangency portfolio’s systematic and unsystematic components. We find that the systematic component only outperforms the unsystematic component during low-sentiment regimes once we control for estimation risk and transaction costs. However, the asset mispricing exploited by the unsystematic component can significantly improve an investor’s risk-return tradeoff during high-sentiment regimes, even after accounting for implementation frictions. We capitalize on this finding to construct sentiment-based portfolios that span the achievable efficient frontier better than existing methods.
Interday Cross-Sectional Momentum: Global Evidence and Determinants
Presenter: Sebastian Schlie (University of Hagen)
Authors: Sebastian Schlie (University of Hagen), Xiaozhou Zhou Zhou (University of Quebec at Montreal)
Discussant: Yoann Martin (Dauphine University)
Abstract: Using a novel set of international high-frequency data, we examine whether half-hour returns continue to predict half-hour returns on subsequent days in global stock markets at the firm level, and how market characteristics determine the strength of this “interday momentum" pattern. Our results show that the pattern is still present in the U.S., albeit weaker than in previous studies, and that it also exists across all novel markets of our sample. The pattern is most pronounced during the last half-hour interval of a trading day. Interday momentum tends to decline for high-volatility stocks, and after a more pronounced absolute overnight return. The strategic timing of trades can save international investors transaction costs of economically significant size.
The erosive and positive effects of risk and growth on binomial Discounted Cash Flows, as a function of the investment horizon
Presenter: Yoann Martin (Dauphine University)
Authors: Yoann Martin (Dauphine University)
Discussant: Nathan Lassance (UCLouvain)
Abstract: This paper provides an original binomial formulation of the Discounted Cash Flows (DCF) model and analyzes its consequences, in terms of the effects of risk on the growth and value of economic activities, as a function of the investment horizon. This model combines two key elements - first, the cash flows (CF) underlying the model are formed by an economic activity, of any nature and following a binomial evolution law. This introduces the notion of risk at the most fundamental level of DCF formation. The other key element is the transformation of this binomial economic activity into terms of CF (and DCF), by implementing an algebraic theory of accounting, notably capable of capturing all the complex lag effects (e.g., payment terms, storage duration) at work in the formation of CF. This framework reveals first the connection of risk with the growth of the same economic activity, showing positive compositional effects at long-term horizons, becoming erosive to short-term due to the lag effects affecting the formation of cash flows. These elements help explain observations of the short-term erosive effects of activity growth on value and stock returns, as well as the positive effects of risk for long-term investors, revealing an asymmetry in perception of value, risk and growth as a function of the investment horizon.
Beta Horizons
Presenter: Paul Karehnke (ESCP Business School)
Authors: Paul Karehnke (ESCP Business School), Frans de Roon (Tilburg University)
Discussant: Sebastian Schlie (University of Hagen)
Abstract: We relate beta estimates at different frequencies to each other. Both the unconditional distribution of betas and the distribution conditional on their monthly estimate become more dispersed and closer to a lognormal distribution as the estimation horizon increases. Implied longer horizon beta estimates that assume either i.i.d. returns or simple auto-correlation dynamics provide much better estimates of longer horizon betas than short-horizon betas. Longer horizon betas and mean holding period returns yield positive and reasonable market risk premium estimates, even for characteristics-sorted portfolios that have been shown to pose a challenge for the CAPM.
Corporate finance II
Room: Room 502
Chair: Partha P. Roy (University of Southampton)
Workplace Automation and Corporate Innovation
Presenter: Andreanne Tremblay (Université Laval)
Authors: Andreanne Tremblay (Université Laval), Shiu-Yik Au (University of Manitoba), Gunchang Kim (Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)
Discussant: Partha P. Roy (University of Southampton)
Abstract: This paper examines the impact of workplace automation on corporate innovation. We find that firms with high capability for substituting labor force with automated capital (high-SLAC firms) file more, and higher quality patents relative to low-SLAC firms. We provide causal evidence using the hard-drive crisis in Thailand as an exogenous shock to automation cost. We also provide evidence that the channel is related to employees; firms respond to the challenge of hiring key inventors in competitive local labor markets by spending more on human resources, which, together with the reallocation of labor incentivized by SLAC, results in more innovation. We also document that high-SLAC firms’ innovation is explorative rather than exploitative, consistent with the theory that high-SLAC firms focus on retaining key inventors. Overall, our study provides new evidence of how workplace automation impacts corporate innovation.
What is the impact of bank branch closures on SME financing? The French case
Presenter: Anais Hamelin (Université de Strasbourg)
Authors: Anais Hamelin (Université de Strasbourg), Evelyne Rousselet (IAE Gustave Eiffel), Stéphanie SERVE (UPEC), Jean-Loup Soula (EM Strasbourg)
Discussant: Andreanne Tremblay (Université Laval)
Abstract: This paper investigates the relationship between SME’s access to banking debt and the dynamic of local banking structure. Using a unique dataset built from the compilation of firm-level data from Amadeus and bank branch data from OGRB over the 2014-2018 period, we are able to observe the influence of local banking market dynamics on the financing capacity of small firms. We observe that branch closures, at the zip code level, significantly reduce the level of long-term debt of firms located in the same zip code. Furthermore, we observe that the negative effect of bank closures on firms' financing capacity is stronger for smaller and standalone firms. Our results have several managerial implications for banks and policy makers regarding the risk of financial exclusion and the economic vitality of territories.
Immigration Fear, Populism, and Institutional Investors
Presenter: Partha P. Roy (University of Southampton)
Authors: Partha P. Roy (University of Southampton)
Discussant: Romain Boulland (ESSEC Business School)
Abstract: We investigate whether immigration induced fear sentiments affect the investment decisions of institutional investors. Using a text-based measure of immigration fear and data from four developed economies, we show that higher immigration fear sentiments trigger institutional investors to divest from their investee firms. This effect is most pronounced among domestic, independent, and short-term institutional investors. Further, right-wing populism intensifies the negative impact of immigration fear sentiments on institutional investors’ investments. We use an instrumental variable approach and exploit an exogenous event that caused a surge in immigration fear sentiments in our empirical analyses to establish causality and strengthen our findings. Finally, we demonstrate that it is the institutional investors’ fear-based risk-aversion and not information on future firm performance that induces them to make their divestment choices during periods of heightened immigration fear.
Overcorrection: The Spillover Effect of Analysts’ Learning after Forced CEO Departures
Presenter: Romain Boulland (ESSEC Business School)
Authors: Romain Boulland (ESSEC Business School), Jose-Miguel Gaspar (ESSEC Business School), Yujie Song (ESSEC Business School)
Discussant: Anais Hamelin (Univ of Strasbourg)
Experimental finance
Room: Room 503
Chair: Patrick Roger (Université de Nouvelle-Calédonie)
Price magnitude, trading behavior and mispricing: An experiment
Presenter: Patrick Roger (Université de Nouvelle-Calédonie)
Authors: Patrick Roger (Université de Nouvelle-Calédonie), Tristan Roger (ICN Business School, Nancy), Wael Bousselmi (ESSCA), Marc Willinger (Université de Montpellier)
Discussant: Lukas Mertes (University of Mannheim)
Abstract: Empirical evidence shows that stock price magnitude influences portfolio choices and/or future returns, an observation at odds with standard finance theory. Authors most often refer to stock characteristics like a high variance and a positive skewness of returns to justify this result. In this paper, we use an experimental setting to demonstrate that price magnitude impacts investors behavior and market mispricing, independently of the distribution of future returns. Our results show that lottery-like features or perceived skewness are not enough to explain the role of price magnitude. We interpret this anomaly in the light of the neuropsychological theory of the perception of numbers by the human brain. Our experimental market design allows us to show that subjects process “small”and “large”prices differently, everything else being equal, in particular the objective distribution of future returns. Two consecutive treatments are performed, one with a fundamental value equal to 6 (small price market) and one with a fundamental value equal to 72 (large price market). The small price market exhibits greater mispricing than the large price market. Our findings cannot be explained by stock characteristics (lottery-like features or perceived skewness); the price magnitude in itself has a direct impact on how the subjects’ brain perceive the distribution of future returns. Though at odds with standard finance theory, our findings are consistent with: (1) evidence in neuropsychology on the use of different mental scales for small and large numbers, and (2) empirical results in the finance literature.
Information Processing: The Role of Expertise within Peer Effects
Presenter: Lukas Mertes (University of Mannheim)
Authors: Lukas Mertes (University of Mannheim), Martin Weber (University of Mannheim)
Discussant: Ivana Vitanova (Université Lyon 2)
Abstract: We experimentally examine the mechanisms underlying peer effects in financial markets. We hypothesize that individuals are not too confident about how to process information regarding financial markets and thus look among their peers for someone who is more capable in processing the information – an expert. Our experimental evidence supports this hypothesis: Peers with higher relative expertise are followed more strongly. In our experimental design peers do not possess additional information to ensure that our results are driven by the ability to process common information. We therefore introduce a new channel to the peer effects literature - information processing.
Positive anticipatory emotions for becoming a millionaire: a neurofinance experiment
Presenter: Guillaume Baechler (Universite-Paris-Saclay.fr)
Authors: Guillaume Baechler (Universite-Paris-Saclay.fr), Laurent Germain (TBS Education)
Discussant: Patrick Roger (Université de Nouvelle-Calédonie)
Abstract: In this paper, we conduct a neurofinance experiment to explore anticipatory emotions in lottery games, akin to those observed in games like Powerball or EuroMillions. We design a game that features two lotteries, differentiated solely by their skewness levels. Our findings indicate that prior to learning the lottery results, HRV (Heart Rate Variability) measures are elevated compared to post-draw levels. We use HRV as an indicator for NAcc (Nucleus Accumbens) activation. Our study assesses the model put forth by Brunnermeier and Parker (2005), which posits that economic agents derive a first-order gain when investing in lottery-like assets but face a second-order loss. We demonstrate that participants in our game indeed experience anticipatory emotions. Furthermore, those who choose the non-skewed lottery exhibit greater self-regulation.
Examining the Impact of Managerial Narcissism, Optimism, and Emotional Stability on the Willingness to Initiate Insolvency Proceedings
Presenter: Ivana Vitanova (Université Lyon 2)
Authors: Rachid Achbah (Université Lyon 2), Ivana Vitanova (Université Lyon 2), Marc Fréchet (IAE de Saint-Etienne)
Discussant: Guillaume Baechler (Universite-Paris-Saclay.fr)
Financial markets
Room: Room 505
Chair: Arthur Beddock (City University of Hong Kong)
Heterogeneous Beliefs, Bonds, and Interest Rates
Presenter: Arthur Beddock (City University of Hong Kong)
Authors: Arthur Beddock (City University of Hong Kong), Elyès Jouini (Université Paris Dauphine - PSL)
Discussant: Erkin Diyarbakirlioglu (Université Paris-Est Créteil)
Abstract: We develop a general equilibrium model of interest rates in a continuous-time production economy populated by shareholders with heterogeneous beliefs. It allows us to study the impact of belief heterogeneity on the risk-free rate and bond characteristics. The model leads to a CIR-model-like dynamic of the risk-free rate with time-dependent parameters that depend endogenously on belief heterogeneity. Flight-to-safety induces an increase in the bond price when the share of optimists declines. In addition, the impact of belief dispersion increases with the bond maturity and higher dispersion results in higher bond prices in economies where pessimistic shareholders hold most of the wealth. In optimistic economies, the relation reverses except for the case of highly dispersed beliefs and (very) long-term bonds. Lastly, heterogeneous beliefs increase bond yield volatility, helping to solve the excess bond yield volatility puzzle.
Higher-moments estimation of the industry cost of equity capital with errors-in-variables
Presenter: Erkin Diyarbakirlioglu (Université Paris-Est Créteil)
Authors: Erkin Diyarbakirlioglu (Université Paris-Est Créteil), Marc Desban (Université Paris-Est Créteil)
Discussant: Chia-Yi Yen (University of Mannheim)
Abstract: Despite several market anomalies documented in the literature and a “zoo” of risk factors (Cochrane, 2011), the accurate interpretation of abnormal returns remains an unresolved issue in asset pricing studies. The central premise of this study is to take an alternative perspective that focuses on measurement error in observed risk factor series as a potential explanation. Specifically, we run time-series regressions to estimate industry cost of equity for U.S. industry portfolios observed from 1990 to 2022. We consider four popular specifications (CAPM, Fama-French 3-factor, Carhart 4-factor and Fama-French 5-factor) and compare the results obtained by a conventional OLS with those derived from an instrumental variables approach, namely (Dagenais and Dagenais, 1997) higher-moment estimation, devised to account for potential measurement errors in explanatory variables. Our findings reveal significant disparities across industries, with differences reaching up to 10% in certain sectors. Incorporating higher moments improves the explanatory power of the time series regressions, reduces distortions in estimates of factor sensitivities, and decreases the magnitudes and significance of intercepts. This research presents an econometric solution in a finance research area lacking consensus, paving the way for further exploration.
Does ESG matter more than Tracking Error ?
Presenter: john coadou (Amundi Asset Management)
Authors: john coadou (Amundi Asset Management), Serge Darolles (Université Paris Dauphine-PSL)
Discussant: Arthur Beddock (City University of Hong Kong)
Abstract: The surge of interest in socially responsible investment (SRI) over the last decade generates a shift in investors’ belief but also new challenges to assess. Both, passive and active investment management step in this new field, integrating extra financial data within investment process. However, this trend opens up a Pandora’s box for active portfolio managers. The ESG-related track error induced by the integration non-pecuniary factors within the decision-making process emerges. This paper investigates whether investors may favor securities presenting features in line with fundamental portfolio guidelines, namely better ESG quality and optimal Index tracking. Using US-listed firms of the USA MSCI Index and Refinitiv ESG score from 2013 to 2021, we propose a double sort methodology to assess our assumption. We found that Low ESG-Beta stocks are relinquished by investors in order to answer new constrains and generate higher risk adjusted returns. However, findings do not confirm if this phenomena happens in profit of High-ESG-Beta securities. Our results also involve that this possible phenomena is relatively recent undertaking.
Too Much “Skin in the Game” Ruins the Game? Evidence from Managerial Capital Gains Taxes
Presenter: Chia-Yi Yen (University of Mannheim)
Authors: Chia-Yi Yen (University of Mannheim), Anna Theresa Buehrle (German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin))
Discussant: john coadou (Amundi Asset Management)
Abstract: Co-investment, often seen as a remedy for agency problems, may incentivize asset managers to cater to their own preferences. We provide evidence that mutual fund managers with considerable co-investment stakes in their managed funds alter risk-taking decisions to prioritize their own tax interests. Exploiting the enactment of the American Taxpayer Relief Act 2012 as an exogenous shock to managerial capital gains taxes, we observe that co-investing fund managers increase risk-taking by 8%, as compared to managers without co-investment. More specifically, these managers adjust their portfolios by investing in stocks with higher beta. The observed effect appears to be driven by agency incentives and results in a deterioration of fund performance. We highlight the role of co-investment in transmitting managerial tax shocks to mutual funds.
Financial risk management
Room: Room 506
Chair: Killian Plusanski (AMUNDI and CY Cergy Paris Université)
Safe Distance to Systemic Risk
Presenter: Renzhi LIU (University Paris Dauphine-PSL)
Authors: Sylvain Benoit (University Paris Dauphine-PSL), Renzhi LIU (University Paris Dauphine-PSL)
Discussant: Niclas Käfer (University of St.Gallen)
Abstract: In this study, we propose a new systemic risk indicator to measure the distance to the extreme losses of a financial system. Our indicator is based on cross-sectional concomitant VaR exceptions (Co-Exceptions) observed at a daily frequency, which are then converted into a weekly time series with only the maximum values to apply extreme value models. A set of 95 large U.S. financial institutions is used to run the empirical analysis over the last 20 years to check the real-time ability of our framework to predict significant financial crises, such as the Great Financial Crisis of 2008, the sovereign debt crisis of 2010 or the COVID lockdowns of 2020. Our systemic-risk indicator identifies accurately this surge in systemic risk and provides additional information compared to the VIX indicator or the Value-at-Risk of the market. Finally, we show that this new measure of financial instability is explained by macroeconomic variables, such as industrial production and unemployment which have a positive impact, whereas the consumer price index, interest rate, and federal funds rate have a negative impact.
Machine Learning, Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy: Can Macroprudential Policy be Microtargeted?
Presenter: Max Berre (Universite de Lyon)
Authors: Max Berre (Universite de Lyon)
Discussant: Renzhi LIU (University Paris Dauphine-PSL)
Abstract: As it is, currently-existing empirical literature is able to successfully examine macroprudential policy effects on bank systemic risk and the role of inflation targeting in such effects, with a great deal of accuracy. Because recent advancements in machine-learning have given rise to customizable segmented-modeling approaches, this study aims to re-examine the modeling used in recent prominent macroprudential studies, using recently-developed tree-based modeling approaches. Because macroprudential policy must operate in tandem with monetary policy regimes, such empirical and modeling approaches have the potential to uncover critical insights on interactions, conditionalities, and faultlines inherent to the parallel deployment of monetary and macroprudential policy tools.
Portfolio Protection versus Performance Participation: On the Overlay Strategies
Presenter: Killian Plusanski (AMUNDI and CY Cergy Paris Université)
Authors: Killian Plusanski (AMUNDI and CY Cergy Paris Université), Jean-Luc Prigent (THEMA, CY Cergy Paris University), Hassan Malongo (AMUNDI)
Discussant: Max Berre (Universite de Lyon)
Abstract: This paper examines the properties of portfolio strategies which aim at providing portfolio protection against major drawdowns of the financial market while allowing the investors to participate significantly to market performance. Such investors have to make a trade-off between the level of protection required and the cost of this protection, which means they lose out on better return opportunities if the market rises. To carry out this study, we illustrate and compare their performance using various criteria, such as the comparison of their payoffs, the basic properties of their cumulative return distribution functions, and their performance with respect to Kappa measures. We also introduce the notion of compensating variation to gauge their respective expected utilities. Our study reveals that the trade-off between the level of protection required and the cost of this protection depends crucially on the risk aversion and protection levels and the volatility level and that the scale of their impact varies abruptly.
Option Factor Momentum
Presenter: Niclas Käfer (University of St.Gallen)
Authors: Niclas Käfer (University of St.Gallen), Mathis Moerke (University of St.Gallen), Tobias Wiest (University of St.Gallen)
Discussant: Killian Plusanski (AMUNDI and CY Cergy Paris Université)
Abstract: We document profitable cross-sectional and time-series momentum in 56 option factors constructed from monthly sorts on daily delta-hedged option positions. Option factor returns are highly autocorrelated, but momentum profits of strategies with longer formation periods are mainly driven by high mean returns that persistently differ across factors. Momentum effects are the strongest in the factors' largest principal components, consistent with findings for stock factor momentum. Finally, we find a new form of momentum in options markets: momentum in single delta-hedged option returns. Option factor momentum fully subsumes option momentum, whereas option momentum cannot explain option factor momentum. Our findings provide insights into the channels that drive option momentum and have implications for designing profitable option trading strategies.
Corporate governance I
Room: Room 507
Chair: Magnus Blomkvist (EDHEC business school)
Dual class shares design in corporate firms: An endogenous financial governance model
Presenter: hubert de La Bruslerie (IAE Paris Sorbonne)
Authors: hubert de La Bruslerie (IAE Paris Sorbonne)
Discussant: Etienne Redor (Audencia business School)
Abstract: The theoretical issue of the optimal “wedge” between voting rights and cash flow rights is the straightforward consequence of the shareholding structuration in different classes, namely Dual class shares (DCS). It raises the question of the number of votes to give to the shares belonging to the superior right classes. The purpose of the paper is to demonstrate that we need to endogenize the wedge not as a symptom of the conflict, but as a variable of an implicit contract. The paper contributes to the theoretical literature and gives insights to understand the development of DCS in certain industry by outlining the role of specific assets. DCS are shown to be a way to solve the conflict between the incentivization and the entrenchment effects. Simulations of the model show that an agency equilibrium is more difficult to obtain, or even not possible, in a One-share-one vote framework. The design of DCS becomes the only framework to set up joint solutions. Simulations justify DCS systems with low voting ratios for low and medium specific assets-firms. To justify higher voting ratios in the range of 10 or 20 votes per superior right share, we need to refer to specific assets intensive-firms and to high value creation prospects.
Unraveling the Effectiveness of Gender Quotas: Insights from Shareholder Preferences
Presenter: Magnus Blomkvist (EDHEC business school)
Authors: Magnus Blomkvist (EDHEC business school), Anders Löflund (Hanken school of economics), Eva Liljeblom (Hanken school of economics), Etienne Redor (Audencia business School)
Discussant: hubert de La Bruslerie (IAE Paris Sorbonne)
Abstract: This study examines the shareholder voting outcomes concerning individual director nominees in the context of mandated gender quotas in France. Contrary to the arguments of gender quota opponents, our findings indicate that the supply of qualified female candidates meets the quota induced incremental demand. The results suggest that the prior underrepresentation of female directors results from director labour market frictions. Notably, we observe greater support for female nominees subsequent to the quota introduction. However, the disparities in voting outcomes between female and male nominees can be entirely explained by controlling for director characteristics. An important discovery from our analysis is that shareholders revise their assessment of female qualifications post-quota, thereby establishing female qualifications as equally valuable as those of their male counterparts. Overall, our study has significant implications for the ongoing debate concerning mandated gender quotas in shaping corporate governance practices.
The role of individual factors in director elections
Presenter: Etienne Redor (Audencia business School)
Authors: Etienne Redor (Audencia business School), Isabelle Allemand (Burgundy School of Business, CEREN EA 7477, Burgundy School of Business - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté), Daniela Borodak (ESC Clermont Business School, ClerMa), Xavier Hollandts (KEDGE Business School, ClerMa)
Discussant: Magnus Blomkvist (EDHEC business school)
Abstract: Shareholder votes on the appointment of directors at annual general meetings are crucial because the board represents their interests, and its role is to ensure the company's sustainability. Individual, firm, and industry levels of characteristics influence these votes. By examining 2397 director appointments in SBF120 firms between 2010 and 2022, we propose an in-depth analysis of the influence of individual-level factors on shareholder votes. The importance of director characteristics relative to firm and industry characteristics is confirmed, especially for new directors. Agency theory prevails on the resource framework in shareholders' minds. Independence positively affects votes, while tenure and multiple directorships have a negative effect. The quality of corporate governance also has an impact on votes.
Organizational Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability — Empirical Evidence from the Micro-Foundations of Financial Technology Firms (Fintechs)
Presenter: Ji-Yong LEE (Audencia Business School )
Authors: Jean MOUSSAVOU (Excelia Business School), Ji-Yong LEE (Audencia Business School )
Discussant: Karima Bouaiss (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Abstract: The theoretical perspectives of organizational ambidexterity (OA) and dynamic capabilities (DCs) have greatly contributed to discussions specific to management about how organizations successfully survive and adapt to the environment. Although these two perspectives have evolved separately in the literature, a more recent approach is to consider OA as a dynamic capability in order to better capture the organizational dynamics that respond to the imperatives of ambidexterity. However, current analyses are focused on the macro-relationships that govern these two perspectives. Little attention has been paid to the micro-foundations that emerge from actors and their interactions within an organization. The objective of this article is to fill this gap and contribute to the developing discussion. It aims to identify the micro-foundations through which OA as a dynamic capacity manifests in organizations. A collection of primary and secondary data is drawn from technology firms in the banking and finance sector, characterized by a dynamic and competitive environment, then analyzed using the Gioia methodology. The results highlight the nature of micro-foundations that allow managers to develop the capabilities of detecting and seizing new market opportunities and reconfiguring existing organizational assets. The results contribute to the literature on ambidextrous organizational strategies and the understanding of OA as a dynamic capability. They also provide insights for small technology firms in their choices of organizational and innovative practices, but also for public policies that support this type of innovative and potentially job-creating approach and economic development.
Green finance I
Room: Room 510
Chair: Tristan Roger (ICN Business School, Nancy)
Do retail investors care for sustainability? - Preference for and pricing of sustainable structured retail products
Presenter: Falk Jensen (University of Hagen)
Authors: Falk Jensen (University of Hagen), Rainer Baule (University of Hagen), David Shkel (University of Hagen)
Discussant: Linh TRAN DIEU (University Paris Saclay)
Abstract: On the professional market sustainability has become an important factor for investment decisions. However the literature surrounding retail investors is thin in comparison. Structured retail products are products primarily marketed towards them by issuing banks. Their payoff profile can usually be replicated by an investment into an underlying together with some derivative component. It is possible for issuers to adjust premiums on these certificates to gain increased profits. Recently issuers of these products have started to market them as 'sustainable' for specific underlyings. This new information may have direct consequences for investment decisions if retail investors have sustainability preferences. It is however not a priori clear, which information regarding sustainability, if any, is used by retail investors. Although the validity of these labels is debatable, they do not impose information cost on retail investors and are a unique opportunity to analyze the change of investment behaviour on their introduction. By using a large set of exchange order data from the German market, we show that retail investment behaviour (i) is best explained by broader, non-specific sustainability measures, (ii) changes significantly by introducing 'sustainability labels', (iii) is only recently oriented towards sustainability, but (iv) issuers do not abuse this kind of additional demand.
Local Political Preferences and Green Municipal Bonds
Presenter: Xiaoxiong Hu (NEOMA Business School)
Authors: Xiaoxiong Hu (NEOMA Business School), Xin Chang (Nanyang Technological University), Rui Shen (The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen)
Discussant: Tristan Roger (ICN Business School, Nancy)
Abstract: This study investigates how local political preferences affect green municipal bonds’ issuance and pricing outcomes in the United States. We find that municipalities in Democratic party leaning (blue) counties are more inclined to issue green municipal bonds relative to ordinary bonds than those in Republican party leaning (red) counties. Restricting the sample to green and ordinary municipal bonds issued by the same issuer, we find that green bonds on average are not priced at a premium compared to otherwise identical ordinary bonds. However, the green premium is significant for the subsample of bonds issued in blue counties, and there is significant pricing discount for green bonds issued in red counties in the pooled fixed effects specifications. The pricing premium of green municipals in blue counties/states becomes insignificant when a stricter matching method as used by Larker and Watts (2020) is applied, while the pricing discount in red counties/states remains. To further identify the underlying channel of the pricing difference, we use the state-level market segmentation feature of tax-exempt municipal bonds as an identification. We find that the pricing differences are more significant in the tax-exempt municipal bond market. As tax-exempt municipal bonds are closely held by in-state investors due to the asymmetric tax exemption treatment between in-state and out-of-state investors, the results suggest that local investors’ political preferences shape the issuance and pricing of green municipal bonds.
Green Values and Transparency of Household Savings: A Survey
Presenter: Tristan Roger (ICN Business School)
Authors: Tristan Roger (ICN Business School), Maxime Merli (EM Strasbourg), Mariya Pulikova (EM Strasbourg)
Discussant: Falk Jensen (University of Hagen)
Abstract: This paper studies the interest of individuals for transparency regarding how their savings are invested. Using a sample of 1,075 questionnaires from a panel of French individuals who participate in the financial decisions of their households, we investigate whether these individuals care about the sector allocation and the carbon footprint of their savings. Our results show that green consumption values are the main driver of interest for transparency. Furthermore, by analyzing the willingness of individuals to pay for transparency, we show the reluctance of individuals who exhibit green values to pay for this kind of information. In addition, our results show that individuals with pecuniary motives for sustainable investments also attach great importance to transparency. From a general standpoint, our findings contribute to analyzing the barriers that may hinder the mobilization of household savings for funding the green transition.
Effects of mandatory climate-related information disclosure on mutual funds
Presenter: Linh TRAN DIEU (University Paris Saclay)
Authors: Jean-François Gajewski (University Jean Moulin Lyon 3, IAELyon, Magellan), Linh TRAN DIEU (University Paris Saclay)
Discussant: Xiaoxiong Hu (NEOMA Business School)
16:00 - 17:30
40th Conference Special Session learn more
Tracing the Roots of Finance Research in France: The Role of AFFI
Room: Amphi Pierre Mauroy
Chair: Levasseur Michel (Université de Lille)

With the participation of: Jean-François Boulier (AF2i), Alain Chevalier (ESCP), Bernard Dumas (INSEAD), Gérard Hirigoyen (Université de Bordeaux), Bruno Husson (Accuracy), Bertrand Jacquillat (IEP Paris), Michel Levasseur (Université de Lille), Frédéric Lobez (Université de Lille), Roland Pérez (Université de Montpellier) and Yves Simon (Université Paris-Dauphine).

For this session, the oral presentations will be in French, but the supporting materials will be in English.

19:30 - 23:00
Cocktail and Gala Dinner learn more
Couvent des Minimes, 17 quai du wault at Lille During the evening the following awards will be presented: Best Conference Paper Award, Best PhD Workshop Paper Award, Best Revue Finance Paper Award and The CASCAD Best Reproduced Paper Award
08:45 - 10:45
Parallel Sessions III learn more
Innovations in Investment Strategies and Market Dynamics
Room: Room 501
Chair: Lennart Dekker (De Nederlandsche Bank)
Balanced Trading Activity and Asset Pricing
Presenter: Zeming Li (University of Bristol)
Authors: Xinyu Cui (University of Bristol), Zeming Li (University of Bristol)
Discussant: Indigo Jones (Université d’Orléans, LÉO)
Abstract: Measuring how balanced the trading activity is in the cross-section via the skewness of individual stock turnover, we show that the relationship between beta and expected return is linear and significantly positive when trading is more balanced. This effect is robust to a variety of test portfolios as well as different sub-samples. It is not driven by the positive beta-return relationship on macroeconomic announcement days, leading earnings announcement days, or Fridays. We explore and discuss two plausible explanations that are related to risk-based and behavioural models.
Can mutual funds harvest corporate bond liquidity premia?
Presenter: Lennart Dekker (De Nederlandsche Bank)
Authors: Lennart Dekker (De Nederlandsche Bank)
Discussant: Zeming Li (University of Bristol)
Abstract: This paper studies how the performance of corporate bond mutual funds varies with the liquidity of their bond holdings. I show that funds holding relatively illiquid corporate bonds on average underperform funds that hold more liquid portfolios on a risk-adjusted basis over the period 2010-2022. The relation between portfolio liquidity and fund performance is strongest within the set of high-yield funds, consistent with these funds' large exposure to redemption risk. Moreover, the underperformance of less liquid funds is driven by periods in which market liquidity drops, i.e., when flow-induced asset sales are most costly. My findings suggest a reduced ability of mutual funds to harvest illiquidity premia in corporate bonds, which might be caused by a structural liquidity mismatch arising from open-ended structures.
Synthesizing Information-driven Insider Trade Signals
Presenter: Jens Heckmann (University of Duisburg-Essen)
Authors: Jens Heckmann (University of Duisburg-Essen), Heiko Jacobs (University of Duisburg-Essen), Patrick Schwarz (University of Duisburg-Essen)
Discussant: Lennart Dekker (De Nederlandsche Bank)
Abstract: We propose a simple approach to synthesize presumably information-driven insider trading signals for the cross-section of stocks. We find that the resulting composite strategy can predict returns, predominantly in equal-weighted portfolios, in our global sample. The results indicate that the benefits of our composite strategy reflect a short-term informational advantage of insiders. Finally, cross-country analysis reveals that varying insider trading restrictions between countries have limited explanatory power for the benefits of the composite strategy.
Managing a Lazy Investment: Being Actively Passive
Presenter: Indigo Jones (Université d’Orléans, LÉO)
Authors: Sylvain Benoit (Université Paris Dauphine - PSL, UMR CNRS 8007, LEDa-S), Jérémy Dudek (CREST Affiliated Member), Indigo Jones (Université d’Orléans, LÉO)
Discussant: Jens Heckmann (University of Duisburg-Essen)
Abstract: While passively managed financial instruments do not require intervention from their investors, some investors actively manage them anyway. To understand why and how, we use a novel micro-level dataset of 6,247 robo-advisor clients who made 9,250 changes to their investment portfolios between 2015 and 2022. Micro-level demographic and financial variables as well as macro-level market returns and volatility are factors in the decision to change one’s passively managed portfolio. In addition, how these changes affected investors’ returns are studied. A counterfactual test showed that on average accounts which adjusted their portfolio allocation outperformed identical hypothetical accounts in which no changes were made, but this result was not replicated in the field using a more constrained dataset including only realized gains (i.e., closed accounts).
Corporate Governance II
Room: Room 502
Chair: Marc Deloof (Univ of Anterwerp)
Belgian Financial Elites and Destructive Entrepreneurship in King Leopold’s Congo Free State
Presenter: Marc Deloof (University of Antwerp)
Authors: Marc Deloof (University of Antwerp)
Discussant: Andreanne Tremblay (Université Laval)
Abstract: This paper investigates the role of financial elites in one of the worst colonial regimes in history. An analysis of director interlocks between firms operating in the Congo Free State (CFS) and Belgian firms listed on the Brussels Stock Exchange (BSE) reveals that the Belgian financial establishment was a crucial contributor to CFS entrepreneurship from the start, contradicting the idea that business in the CFS was driven by a few rogue financiers.While the number of CFS firms was small and their economic importance was limited, 40% of listed Belgian firms, accounting for more than half of the BSE stock market capitalization, had at least one CFS firm director on their board by 1900. Most of these directors also held a directorship at a Belgian bank. Almost all the large banks, including the Société Générale de Belgique, had two or more CFS firm directors on their board.
It stays between us: CEO-board ties and corporate transparency
Presenter: Loic Belze (emlyon)
Authors: Loic Belze (emlyon), Pascal Nguyen (Université de Montpellier), Cédric Van Appelghem (Université Paris-Saclay)
Discussant: Marc Deloof (Univ of Anterwerp)
Abstract: Social ties between directors and the CEO weaken the board’s monitoring effectiveness and may have detrimental consequences. In this study, we hypothesize that these ties negatively affect corporate disclosures since they create incentives for the CEO to increase the firm’s opacity, behind which private benefits might be extracted. We focus on education ties among the French business elites and exploit the fact that graduates of a tiny group of prestigious colleges form small but highly influential networks. Our results show that information flow decreases with CEO-board social ties. This effect is stronger when firms have a powerful CEO and fewer growth opportunities. However, financial discipline, resulting from the use of debt and greater analyst coverage, can mitigate these negative effects. Overall, our study highlights the impact of CEO-board social ties on corporate transparency and implies that investors and regulators should require firms to fully explain their reasons for appointing CEO-connected directors.
Too few or too many? Untangling the relationship between wom-en on corporate boards and environmental performance: Evidence from a semiparametric method
Presenter: Rey Dang (ISTEC Business School - Paris)
Authors: Rey Dang (ISTEC Business School - Paris), Michel Simioni (INRAE, MOISA, University of Montpellier, University of Toulouse)
Discussant: Loic Belze (EMLYON Business School)
Abstract: This study re-examines the relationship between women on corporate boards (WOCB) and environ-mental performance (EP) for a sample of firms from the Fortune 1000 2020 list over the period 2004-2020 (17 years). To account for the nonlinearity between WOCB and EP and the endogeneity issues associated to this relationship, we consider semiparametric specifica-tions, and specifically generalized additive models (GAM; Wood, 2006). Specifically, we use Marra and Radice’s (2011) two-stage generalized additive model (2SGAM). We find that the effects of WOCB on EP depend significantly on their numerical representation, thereby sug-gesting a nonlinear relationship be-tween WOCB and EP. This is consistent with Kanter’s (1977) regarding token and critical mass theories. Our findings challenge the existing theoret-ical empirical studies on this matter.
When There’s A Cap on SEC Pay, Firms Will Play With Their ROA
Presenter: Andreanne Tremblay (Université Laval)
Authors: Andreanne Tremblay (Université Laval), Shiu-Yik Au (University of Manitoba), Spencer Barnes (University of Texas El Paso)
Discussant: Rey Dang (ISTEC Business School - Paris)
Abstract: We document that firms engage in opportunistic short-term ROA enhancing when they conduct business in an environment with a low probability of detection of financial misconduct. To proxy for a lax monitoring environment, we compute the percentage of local Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) employees earning the exogenously imposed maximum salary, as these employees lack the monetary incentives to increase their monitoring efforts. We find that the percentage of local SEC employees at the salary cap correlates negatively with the detection rate of financial misconduct, and positively with the attrition rate of SEC employees. We also show that in environments with apparent lax SEC monitoring, firms engage in short-term ROA enhancements, principally by increasing their discretionary accruals, and the magnitude of the effect increases when peers of the focal firms also engage in financial misconduct.
Green Finance II
Room: Room 503
Chair: Lin Ma (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Dispelling ESG Investing Risk Misconceptions
Presenter: Sofia Brito-Ramos (ESSEC Business School)
Authors: Sofia Brito-Ramos (ESSEC Business School), Lidia Loban (Deusto Business School), Helena Veiga (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid)
Discussant: Fatima Shuwaikh (Leonard de Vinci Pole Universitaire)
Abstract: This research paper investigates the risks associated with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) funds, aiming to clarify common misconceptions. We conduct an empirical study comparing the Value at Risk (VaR) and Downside-to-Upside Volatility (DUVOL) for ESG and non-ESG funds (the control sample). First, we establish that although VaR and DUVOL are both interpreted as downside risk measures, they exhibit different behaviors because one is an absolute measure and the other captures asymmetric volatility behavior, thus the results differ. Our results show that ESG funds have a higher VaR and ESG scores. However, no statistically significant relationship is found between ESG funds (or ESG risk scores) and DUVOL. This finding is consistent across a range of methods, including adding category and time effects, using instrumental variables, and matching methods. Finally, we investigate the predictability of downside risk using random forests methods. The results suggest that ESG risk scores are relatively more important in predicting downside risk than being an ESG fund. The overall findings are supportive of a link between ESG risk scores and downside risk, challenging the conventional belief that ESG funds inherently carry higher risks. These insights aim to enrich our understanding of the role of ESG investing in modern portfolio management strategies.
Unveiling Pathways for Environmental Innovation through Corporate Venture Capital Investments
Presenter: Fatima Shuwaikh (Leonard de Vinci Pole Universitaire)
Authors: Fatima Shuwaikh (Leonard de Vinci Pole Universitaire), Rodrigo Gonçalves (Catolica Lisbon School of Business and Economics)
Discussant: Sofia Brito-Ramos (ESSEC Business School)
Does ESG Transparency Improve Stock Liquidity? Evidence from US Markets
Authors: Selma Bousetta (University of Bordeaux), Amal Aouadi (IAE de Lille), Lin Ma (IAE de lille)
Discussant: Mélanie Wasilewski (Université de Bordeaux)
Abstract: Relying on the Refinitiv ESG database, we calculate ESG transparency(ESGT) scores at different levels. Based on a US sample from 2010 to 2019, we find that ESGT increases liquidity by more than 4.2% on average. This finding is robust to various model specifications, the inclusion of firm, industry, state and year fixed-effects, and alternative measures of liquidity. We also mitigate the endogeneity concerns by using change regressions, 2SLS estimation, and an event study with various treatment effect estimators. Further analyses show that the positive effect of ESGT on stock liquidity is more pronounced for firms experiencing lower ESG ratings, higher shareholder awareness, and enhanced financial disclosure quality. This is consistent with the assumption that greater ESG disclosure may reduce information asymmetry and improve stock market liquidity.
Investors' consideration of carbon data: a cost-of-equity approach
Presenter: Mélanie Wasilewski (Université de Bordeaux)
Authors: Mélanie Wasilewski (Université de Bordeaux)
Discussant: Lin Ma (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Abstract: The aim of this article is to test the relevance of the carbon indicator based on its impact on the cost of equity capital. We use the Fama and French 3-factor model extended to the industry effect, to which we add the carbon factor, adjusted using different approaches. Overall, our results tend to demonstrate the significant influence of emission levels on the cost of equity capital. This effect varies according to the approaches used, helping to explain the diversity of research findings on the subject. In the absence of consensus and universal regulation on the definition of a carbon indicator, researchers and professionals are facing difficulties in measuring its real effect.
International Finance
Room: Room 505
Chair: Christian Haddad (Excelia Business School)
Monitoring time-varying systemic risk in sovereign debt and currency markets with generative AI
Presenter: Sabuhi Khalili (Universitat de Barcelona)
Authors: Helena Chulia (Universitat de Barcelona), Sabuhi Khalili (Universitat de Barcelona), Jorge Mario Uribe Gil (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya)
Discussant: Erik Devos (University of Texas at El Paso)
Abstract: We propose generative artificial intelligence to measure systemic risk in the global markets of sovereign debt and foreign exchange. We compare three previously unexplored models in economics literature and integrate them with traditional factor models from econometrics. These models are Time Variational Autoencoders, Time Generative Adversarial Networks, and Transformer-based Time-series Generative Adversarial Networks. We provide empirical evidence that favors the Variational Autoencoder. Our findings indicate that the credit default swaps and foreign exchange markets are susceptible to systemic risk, with an observed historically high probability of distress by the end of 2022 according to both the Joint Probability of Distress and the Expected Proportion of Markets in Distress. Our results provide crucial insights for governments in both developed and developing countries, as our models generate realistic counterfactual scenarios that are yet to occur in global markets. These worst-case scenarios are likely to occur if systemic risk materializes, emphasizing the importance of considering them when implementing macroprudential policies aimed at preserving financial stability.
Antitrust and LIE: The Impact of Competition on International Labor Investment Efficiency
Presenter: Erik Devos (University of Texas at El Paso)
Authors: Erik Devos (University of Texas at El Paso), Yoonsoo Nam (Clemson University), Adrian Tippit (University of South Dakota)
Discussant: Lidan Zhang (Hanken School of Economics)
Abstract: This article examines the impact of competition on labor investment efficiency in an international context. Using panel data on antitrust laws across 33 countries, we find that competition leads to improved efficiency in hiring decisions through reductions in both over- and under-investment in labor. This competitive effect appears to be driven by the fundamental rules governing competition rather than by regulations focused on law enforcement. We further find that this relationship strengthens in the presence of higher labor adjustment costs and more effective governance. Specifically, when employee protection laws are more potent, collectivism is more prevalent, and amidst elevated political stability, intensified government effectiveness, and heightened rule of law. We interpret our results as evidence that competition prompts active managers to seek improved labor investment efficiency, particularly when faced with efficiency-reducing labor adjustment costs or stricter governance. These results are the opposite when we focus solely on North America.
Renminbi Internationalization and Proliferation of Offshore Renminbi Bonds
Presenter: Lidan Zhang (Hanken School of Economics)
Authors: Lidan Zhang (Hanken School of Economics)
Discussant: Christian Haddad (Excelia Business School)
Abstract: In November 2015, the IMF included the Chinese Renminbi in its SDR basket, which helps internationalize this currency. This study investigates the Renminbi-denominated bond issuances around this event. This inclusion event has a certification effect that creates a boom in issuance of RMB-denominated offshore bonds (Dim-Sum bonds). The increase in issuance volume of Dim-Sum bonds is driven primarily by firms from countries that are less friendly with China diplomatically, which suggests that the certification event is more effective on these issuers. The inclusion of Renminbi in the IMF SDR also reduces the valuation disparity between onshore and offshore Renminbi, which further promotes the proliferation of Renminbi bonds globally.
Country Institutions and Foreign Investment: Evidence from European Multinational Companies
Presenter: Christian Haddad (Excelia Business School)
Authors: Christian Haddad (Excelia Business School), Arnt Verriest (KU Leuven)
Discussant: Sabuhi Khalili (Universitat de Barcelona)
Abstract: We examine the impact of host-country institutions on subsidiary location decisions made by European multinational companies (MNCs). Our analyses occur at the firm-level. We find that better protection of property rights, higher regulatory quality, and more developed financial markets attract more investment from MNCs. In line with our hypotheses, we document a stronger impact of institutions on foreign investment when (i) entry and trade barriers of the host country are higher, (ii) geographic distance between home and host country is larger, and (iii) MNCs are more financially constrained. This study expands our understanding of how institutions affect foreign expansion and which factors moderate their effects.
Macro-Finance
Room: Room 506
Chair: Jean-Laurent Viviani (IAE Rennes)
Macroprudential Policy and Bank Income Dynamics
Presenter: Mamiza Haq (University of Huddersfield)
Authors: Rukaiyat Adebusola Yusuf (University of Huddersfield), Mamiza Haq (University of Huddersfield)
Discussant: Hoang Hiep Nguyen (IGR-IAE Rennes, University of Rennes)
Abstract: Macroprudential policies are frequently put into action to control and alleviate systemic risks, encompassing those with the potential to impact bank revenue. Banks’ non-interest income is among the many factors blamed for the risk-taking that led to the 2007–2008 financial crisis. We test whether and how macroprudential policies such as tightening and loosening influence non-interest income for listed and unlisted banks across 45 countries between 1998 and 2019. We find strong evidence that the adoption of macroprudential policies in the form of loosening are associated with a greater change in non-interest income, particularly during crisis period, indicating that loosening policies might provide banks relief, enabling them to generate more non-interest income due to increased flexibility in lending or investment activities. Further the supply and demand targeted macro prudential policies exhibit mixed results. Our results are robust to several specifications.
Economic Policy Uncertainty, CEO Overconfidence, and Banking Risk
Presenter: Shams Pathan (Newcastle University)
Authors: Shams Pathan (Newcastle University), Kwabena Addo (Utrecht University)
Discussant: Huyen Nguyen (University of Le Mans, France)
Abstract: We examine whether overconfident bank CEOs mitigate or amplify risk amid increasing Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU). Our findings indicate the latter—a risk-aggressive behavioral response to the rise in credit demand during EPU. Cross-sectional analyses reveal that overconfident top bank managers contribute to high loan impairments during EPU through excessive credit extension and under-provision of loan reserves. Therefore, we identify overconfident CEOs as a transmission channel that propagates a vicious cycle of risky credit extension, which, interestingly, enhances bank performance. In light of our findings, boards, and regulators, while acknowledging the value of overconfident CEOs during EPU, should be mindful of the systemic implications of their policies.
Vulnerability and Contagion Risk in the U.S. Equity Mutual Funds
Presenter: Huyen Nguyen (University of Le Mans, France)
Authors: Huyen Nguyen (University of Le Mans, France)
Discussant: Mamiza Haq (University of Huddersfield)
Abstract: We study the vulnerability of different styles of the U.S. domestic equity mutual funds over the period 2003 - 2018. We first perform a macroprudential stress-test by following the framework developed by Fricke and Fricke [2021] in order to assess the resilience of these styles when faced to shocks. Unlike previous studies in this literature, we consider two market conditions and granular asset price impacts, which makes our empirical framework closer to real market situations. We then conduct a contagion analysis by using the Diebold and Yilmaz [2009, 2012, 2014]’s spillover approach to identify the styles which are more vulnerable than others and those which are more likely to spread distress to other funds. Our results show that in turbulent times, fund styles’ vulnerability is much higher than tranquil times and can not be neglected. Large Cap are likely to be the most vulnerable, especially during the subprime crisis. They could exert a strong impact on the system. In contrast, the other styles appear to absorb more information from the system than transmit distress to the system.
The Influence of Macroeconomic Uncertainty on Firm Bankruptcy: A Factor Extended Ensemble-based Machine-Learning Approach on the French Market
Presenter: Hoang Hiep Nguyen (Université de Rennes and CREM)
Authors: Hoang Hiep Nguyen (Université de Rennes and CREM), Jean-Laurent Viviani (Université de Rennes and CREM), Sami Ben Jabeur (UCLy (Lyon Catholic University), ESDES, Lyon, France), Bertrand Maillet (Univ. La Reunion, Saint-Denis, France; Università Cà Foscari di Venezia, Venice, Italy; and Variances, Paris, France )
Discussant: Kwabena Addo (Utrecht University)
Abstract: This article investigates the impact of Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU), Geopolitical Risk (GPR), and our custom French Google Trends Uncertainty (FGTU) indices on ensemble-based bankruptcy prediction models. We assess their potential to enhance the predictive accuracy of XGBoost, LightGBM, NGBoost, and Random Forest models within the Construction and Manufacturing sectors in France. Our findings demonstrate that the inclusion of these factors significantly enhances the models' predictive capabilities. This study provides compelling evidence for the informative nature of these supplementary factors in bankruptcy prediction. Furthermore, the FGTU index, a novel addition to the analysis, shows promise in further enhancing the precision of these models. These findings hold relevance for businesses, financial institutions, and policymakers seeking to improve their bankruptcy risk assessment strategies.
Gender and Social Finance
Room: Room 507
Chair: Edith Ginglinger (Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL)
Does Corporate Political Activity really reduce Discouragement? The Paradox of Women-Led Firms
Presenter: Caroline Perrin (Utrecht University)
Authors: Jeremie BERTRAND (IESEG School of Management), Caroline Perrin (Utrecht University)
Discussant: Edith Ginglinger (Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL)
Abstract: This study delves into the interplay between corporate political activity, gender, and borrower discouragement in credit markets, focusing on women-led firms worldwide. Employing data from 22,822 firms across various countries, it challenges the conventional belief that political connections invariably facilitate credit access. Surprisingly, women-led firms with political ties exhibit increased discouragement, primarily due to heightened awareness of gender biases and structural barriers in the credit market—a consequence of the "know-how" aspect of political connections. The study also uncovers the conditional nature of these connections; in environments with strong legal protections and lower gender inequality, the discouragement effect diminishes, whereas it intensifies in less supportive socio-legal contexts.
Gender Pay Gap, Labor Unions and Firm Performance
Presenter: Edith Ginglinger (Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL)
Authors: Edith Ginglinger (Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL), Fabien-Antoine DUGARDIN (IAE Nancy, Université de Lorraine)
Discussant: Caroline Perrin (Utrecht University)
Abstract: Using detailed employee-employer administrative data, we analyze the impact of the gender pay gap on the performance of firms. When the firm is not unionized, the gender pay gap reduces profitability. In contrast, when unions are present, the gender gap has no effect on profitability in male-dominated firms and increases profitability in female-dominated firms. Our evidence suggests that when there is no union, giving priority to cohesion and pay equality is value-enhancing. In highly feminized firms, unions provide employees with the option of nonpecuniary benefits, with females opting for better work-life balance and males opting for higher salaries. Our findings indicate that in these firms, the gender pay gap may reflect the divergent interests of female and male employees and can positively affect firm value.
Employee Satisfaction and Organizational Performance: A Consideration of Blue- and White-Collar Employees
Presenter: saeed sheykhi (Open University of Netherlands)
Authors: saeed sheykhi (Open University of Netherlands), Dennis Bams (Maastricht University- Open University), Annelies Renders (BI Norwegian Business School)
Discussant: Fabien-Antoine DUGARDIN (IAE Nancy, Université de Lorraine)
Abstract: This study investigates whether employee satisfaction varies between white-collar and blue-collar employees and how this affects financial and non-financial organizational performance In doing so, the study analyzes more than two million Glassdoor employee reviews from 2010 to 2022 for US-listed companies. The findings have several main implications. First, white-collar employees demonstrate a higher level of satisfaction compared to their blue-collar counterparts. Second, both white-collar and blue-collar employees respond similarly to factors motivating and satisfying them. The consistency is derived from the fact that new technologies have transformed work in such a manner that conventional differences between white- and blue-collar workers are no longer relevant. Management strategies such as empowerment and self-directed teams have provided decision-making authority to even the most basic physical workers, while information technology has made knowledge work an integral part of almost every job. Third, employee satisfaction has a positive and statistically significant relationship with financial performance, as assessed by Tobin's Q and ROA. These findings support human capital theories that highlight the importance of employee well-being in achieving corporate success. In particular, white-collar employees have a greater relationship between employee happiness and financial success than blue-collar workers. Finally, both groups demonstrate a significant and positive relationship with non-financial performance. Employees from diverse positions within the company, regardless of the color of the collar, play integral roles in shaping and enhancing non-financial performance.
Labor Unions and Firms Performance: A Panel Analysis
Presenter: Fabien-Antoine DUGARDIN (Université de Lorraine - IAE Nancy)
Authors: Fabien-Antoine DUGARDIN (Université de Lorraine - IAE Nancy)
Discussant: saeed sheykhi (Open University of Netherlands)
Abstract: This paper evaluates the effects of unionization on profitability, labor productivity and wages, using panel data at the firm-level. Using firm-level fixed-effects models, I show that profitability decreases when firms get unionized. When firms are already unionized, profitability also decreases when a second labor union becomes certified, suggesting that labor unions diversity allows employees to gain even more power, for the same union coverage. The union wage premium increases as the number of certified labor unions rises while the labor productivity of the firm does not increase enough to compensate for this increasing wage premium, leading to lower profitability. I also give evidence that the negative (positive) effect of unionization on profitability (wages) happens rapidly after unionization. Labor unions’ seniority within the firm has no effect on profitability, labor productivity, or wages. Moreover, these estimates from firm-level fixed-effects models are only approximatively one third of the pooled OLS estimates. I give evidence that these quantitatively large differences come from strong bias of pooled OLS estimates.
Climate change and climate risks finance
Room: Room 510
Chair: Franck Moraux (Université de Rennes and CREM)
Climate Risk Disclosure and Mergers and Acquisitions
Presenter: Neslihan Ozkan (University of Bristol)
Authors: Fangfei Jiang (University of Bristol), Fangming Xu (University of Bristol)
Discussant: Nicolas Baelen (IAE Clermont Auvergne)
Abstract: This study examines the impact of climate risk disclosures on merger and acquisition (M&A) activities in US public firms from 2001 to 2020. Leveraging the 2010 Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) interpretive guidance as an exogenous shock, we analyze 10-K filings to understand how enhanced climate risk disclosure influences corporate takeovers. By adopting a difference-in-difference (DID) framework, we find a significant reduction in the takeover likelihood for firms beginning climate risk disclosures after the SEC 2010 interpretive guidance. The study also observes a shift in acquisition payment structures for deals acquiring these firms, with acquirers favoring stock components over cash, and identifies a decrease in synergy gains and extended deal completion times. Our analysis also reveals that transparent information environments, low environmental negative spillover potential and strong operational characteristics in policy-driven disclosing firms further decrease their attractiveness in the corporate control market. Overall, our research underscores the critical role of climate risk disclosure in shaping acquirers' decision-making processes in M&A transactions.
Acute vs Chronic Physical Climate Risk and Firm Value
Presenter: Nicolas Baelen (IAE Clermont Auvergne)
Authors: Nicolas Baelen (IAE Clermont Auvergne), Sylvain Marsat (IAE Clermont Auvergne), Guillaume Pijourlet (IAE Clermont Auvergne)
Discussant: Neslihan Ozkan (University of Bristol)
Abstract: This paper investigates the effects of physical climate risk on firm valuation, introducing the distinction between acute and chronic physical risks. Since acute risks are more salient and already experienced compared to chronic risks, we expect them to be more priced by investors. Drawing on an international dataset of 1,293 firms during the 2009-2020 period, we empirically find that acute physical risk has a negative and significant direct association with firm value, while chronic physical risk is not significant on the 2050 horizon. When considering the transmission channels that may explain the influence of physical risks on firm value, both acute and chronic risk have similar effects on ROA, leverage, R&D, and capex. However, compared to chronic risk, the acute risk is shown to indirectly significantly impact more firm value by reducing sales growth and dividends. Finally, we find that acute and overall physical risks are only linked in the most recent period of the sample, showing that investor attention on these issues has evolved over time and that chronic risks become significantly linked when considering long-term horizons. Overall, we document that physical risk should not be taken only as a global issue, since acute and chronic risks are considered and priced differently by investors.
Asset Stranding, Climate Credit Risk and Capital Structure Design Under Global Warming
Presenter: Franck Moraux (Université de Rennes and CREM)
Authors: Moussa Diakho (Université de Rennes and CREM), Franck Moraux (Université de Rennes and CREM)
Discussant: Fanny Cartellier (CREST, ENSAE, Institut Polytechnique de Paris)
Abstract: We investigate the impact of climate change on the pricing of corporate liabilities and on the capital structure of firms. In our model, the transmission channel through which global warming has an impact is the stranding of assets upon liquidation. Our model can generate a number of empirical predictions consistent with recent evidence. We find the firm’s exposure to global warming has a profound effect on decision making and traditional financing choices. We examine how it affects debt capacity and optimal capital structure and we are the first to document a possible disciplinary effect. Typically, the higher the exposure, the lower the debt financing and the higher the equity financing. Interestingly, such lower leverage does not necessarily lead to lower credit spreads. We also examine a range of credit risk management metrics, including the specific compensation investors require for climate credit risk, to disentangle the direct and indirect effects of global warming on credit risk and illustrate how these effects conflict with each other, which ones dominate and when.
Can Investors Curb Greenwashing?
Presenter: Fanny Cartellier (CREST, ENSAE, Institut Polytechnique de Paris)
Authors: Olivier David Zerbib (CREST, ENSAE, Institut Polytechnique de Paris), Fanny Cartellier (CREST, ENSAE, Institut Polytechnique de Paris), Peter Tankov (CREST, ENSAE, Institut Polytechnique de Paris)
Discussant: Franck Moraux (Université de Rennes and CREM)
Abstract: We show how investors with pro-environmental preferences and who penalize revelations of past environmental controversies impact corporate greenwashing practices. Through a dynamic equilibrium model with information asymmetry, we characterize firms’ optimal environmental communication, emissions reduction, and greenwashing policies, and we explain the forces driving them. Notably, under a condition that we explicitly characterize, companies greenwash to inflate their environmental score above their fundamental environmental value, with an effort and impact increasing with investors’ pro-environmental preferences. However, investment decisions that penalize greenwashing, policies increasing transparency, and environment-related technological innovation contribute to mitigating corporate greenwashing. We provide empirical support for our results.
Mergers & Acquisition
Room: Room 511
Chair: Paul Friedrich Hark (University of Münster)
The Acquisition Motive of Newly Credit Rated Firms
Presenter: Magnus Blomkvist (EDHEC business school)
Authors: Anup Basnet (University of Surrey), Magnus Blomkvist (EDHEC business school), Karl Felixson (Hanken school of economics), Eva Liljeblom (Hanken school of economics), Hitesh Vyas (Audencia business School)
Discussant: Fangming Xu (University of Bristol)
Abstract: A large body of research documents an increased acquisition activity among credit rated firms. We examine whether firms seek an initial credit rating to conduct acquisitions, and whether this acquisition activity is driven by empire building or value creation motives. First, we find that acquisitions are a credible motive for seeking a credit rating, initially rated firms are associated with 8.9pp greater acquisition likelihood and these transactions are more likely to be settled by cash. Second, to recoup the costs of becoming rated, firms conduct large-scale high-quality acquisitions associated with 0.97pp higher announcement returns, where the higher CARs are concentrated among large deals made by firms obtaining a speculative grade initial rating. Third, following the initial rating year, acquisition activity dampens to pre-rating levels. In sum our findings lend support to the notion that previously financial constrained firms enter the bond markets to conduct large value enhancing acquisitions.
To Acquire or to Ally? Foreign Competition and Firm Boundary
Presenter: Fangming Xu (University of Bristol)
Authors: Hanwen Sun (University of Bath), Yue Xiang (University of Bath), Fangming Xu (University of Bristol)
Discussant: Paul Friedrich Hark (University of Münster)
Abstract: We find incumbent firms react strategically to reductions in U.S. import tariffs by favoring alliances over acquisitions, a trend more pronounced for firms with less financial or operational flexibility. This shift in external growth strategies is stronger for firms less protected by barriers to entry or in a weaker competitive position. Further, incumbents tend to partner with firms operating in the same industry, high-tech, B2C, or differentiated industries. In the long term, firms opting for alliances exhibit higher R&D intensity and more patents granted. Our study sheds light on how firms redefine their boundaries in response to increased foreign competition.
The 52-Week High and M&A Deals: International Evidence
Presenter: Paul Friedrich Hark (University of Münster)
Authors: Pascal Büsing (University of Münster), Paul Friedrich Hark (University of Münster), Nils Lohmeier (University of Münster), Hannes Mohrschladt (University of Münster)
Discussant: Magnus Blomkvist (EDHEC business school)
Abstract: Motivated by the seminal findings of Baker et al. (2012) and Ma et al. (2019), we examine the effects of stocks’ 52-week highs on mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in a global sample across 34 countries. First, we confirm that the targets’ past stock price peaks serve as a reference point in merger negotiations, impacting both offer premia and the likelihood of deal acceptance. Second, we confirm that acquirers trading far below their 52-week high experience more positive market reactions. However, economic magnitude and statistical significance substantially differ across regions. In sum, the 52-week high plays a smaller role for M&A deals internationally compared to in the United States.
11:15 - 12:30
Keynote Speaker learn more
Prof. Tarun Chordia
Professor Tarun Chordia (Emory University): Beauty Contests and Higher Order Beliefs: Evidence from News Releases
Room: Amphi Pierre Mauroy
Chair: Fredj Jawadi (IAE Lille University School of Management)
13:30 - 14:30
AFFI General Assembly learn more
During the General assembly the following awards will be presented: Best Corporate Finance Thesis Award, Best Case in Finance Award and the Research Prize in Historical Finance Honoring the Memory of Professor Georges Gallais-Hamonno
AFFI General Assembly
Room: Amphi Pierre Mauroy
14:30 - 16:00
Parallel Sessions IV learn more
Banking and financial intermediation II
Room: Room 501
Chair: Neslihan Ozkan (University of Bristol)
Bank Capital and Liquidity Risk: Influence of Crisis and Regulatory Intervention
Authors: Mamiza Haq (University of Huddersfield)
Discussant: Joel Petey (Univ of Strasbourg)
Abstract: This study investigates the effect of capital on asset and liability-liquidity risk measures and the impact of periods of stability and crises. Using an unbalanced panel of 18,670 commercial banks in the USA from 1993Q1-2021Q2, we find some variation across our measures of liquidity risk. For instance, on the asset side of the balance sheet, capital tends to worsen banks’ liquidity position in terms of cash and near cash assets, at all times. By contrast, on the liability-side of the balance sheet, capital enhances liquidity positions (demand deposit and federal funds purchased) during normal and market crisis periods. We document mixed evidence in relation to unused commitments and derivatives over crisis periods. During the Covid-19 period, we observe that bank capital enhances cash, federal funds purchased and demand deposits but worsens federal funds sold. Although an increase in money market deposits and a decrease in derivatives reflects the impact of the liquidity coverage ratio, we find no appreciable evidence of such an effect for an increase (decrease) in demand deposits (cash and near cash assets). Our results are affirmed by several robustness checks.
The Politics of Bank Lending: Empirical Evidence from Brown Borrowers
Presenter: Clara Zhe Wang (University of Bristol)
Authors: Ruby Brownen- Trinh (University of Bristol), Neslihan Ozkan (University of Bristol), Clara Zhe Wang (University of Bristol), Junyang Yin (Heriot-Watt University )
Discussant: Mamiza Haq (University of Huddersfield)
Abstract: This study examines the interplay between banks’ political connection and lending to brown borrowers, i.e. borrowers with poor environmental performance. A bank’s political connection is captured based on whether a bank is headquartered in the state with a member from the U.S. Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee. Using data from DealScan from 1995-2020, we show that banks headquartered in states with a Banking Committee senator provide cheaper loans to brown borrowers than banks without a Banking Committee senator in their headquarters state. This finding suggests that politically connected banks can play a significant role in delaying the green transition as they extend loans to brown firms at a low rate. In addition, we show that the effect of a bank’s political connection on the cost of lending to brown borrowers is more pronounced when the senator is senior or when borrowers, lenders, and banking committee senators are in the same state. Overall, we provide novel evidence on how the political connections of banks influence their lending to brown firms.
Income-based lending standards and credit risk: Lessons from 20 years of French housing loans
Presenter: Joel Petey (LaRGE - Université de Strasbourg)
Authors: Joel Petey (LaRGE - Université de Strasbourg), Michel Dietsch (LaRGE - Université de Strasbourg)
Discussant: Clara Zhe Wang (University of Bristol)
Abstract: Research widely documents the interplay between lending standards, house prices, and risk, both at the micro (defaults) and macro (financial stability) levels. Nonetheless, in France, origination was until recently based on informal debt-service-to-income (DSTI) norms, allowing for the widespread origination of risky housing loans without down payment. Analyzing two millions loans originated from 2000 to 2016, we show that lenders specifically adjust the DSTI of no down payment loans in order to contain their risk, although at a higher level than loans with a down payment. However, this weakens the capacity of income-based lending standards to identify risk and cannot prevent the building-up of pockets of risk over the cycle. We contribute to the literature showing the limitations of lending standards, here DSTI, as risk indicators, suggesting that the design of macroprudential regulations may require more than a single measure.
Behavioral finance
Room: Room 502
Chair: Laurent Vilanova (Université Lyon 2)
Optimism, market entry and competitive deterrence
Presenter: Laurent Vilanova (Univ Lyon 2 - Coactis)
Authors: Laurent Vilanova (Univ Lyon 2 - Coactis)
Discussant: Juliette Bijlholt (University of Strasbourg)
Abstract: I study a sequential entry game in a “winner-take-all” market where success depends on relative ability and some (but not all) entrepreneurs overestimate their own ability. For a potential early entrant, overestimating one’s ability (i.e., individual optimism) can have both negative and positive consequences: it fosters her incentive to enter, which can lead to excess entry but can also limit under-entry (in markets where realistic entrepreneurs stay out); it can also help deter rivals. I show that the net gain of individual optimism (i) depends on market potential (the market’s capacity to provide positive payoffs for one or two firms) and group-level optimism (the fraction of optimists vs. realists among entrepreneurs), (ii) is in general positive in low-potential markets where optimism helps deterring stronger rivals, and (iii) decreases with group-level optimism in high-potential markets and is maximized at moderate levels of group-level optimism in low-potential markets. Finally, I show that overoptimistic beliefs are often persistent, particularly in low-potential markets, and optimism (in comparison with realism) can facilitate learning.
Overconfidence and entrepreneurial firm performance
Presenter: Juliette Bijlholt (University of Strasbourg )
Authors: Juliette Bijlholt (University of Strasbourg ), Anais Hamelin (University of Strasbourg), Marie Pfiffelmann (University of Strasbourg)
Discussant: Laurent Vilanova (Université Lyon 2)
Abstract: This paper investigates the relationship between entrepreneur overconfidence and French SMEs’ performance. Using a unique dataset linking objective firm output such as financial performance to the individual characteristics and biases of their owners, we conclude that overestimation is detrimental to firm performance. The opposite effect appears when examining overplacement and overprecision, which we find to have a positive effect on firm performance. Consequently, our findings are important from an entrepreneurial education standpoint as they show that the crux of the “trouble with overconfidence” (Moore and Healy, 2008) lies in overestimation, and that finding strategies to mitigate this effect might be a key question for entrepreneurs, particularly in SMEs.
Corporate finance III
Room: Room 503
Chair: Nadine Weuschek (University of Muenster)
The behavior of stock prices around the ex-day during a dividend shortage
Presenter: Dusan Isakov (University of Fribourg)
Authors: Nicolas Eugster (University of Queensland), Jean-Philippe Weisskopf (EHL Hospitality Business School), Romain Ducret (University of Fribourg), Dusan Isakov (University of Fribourg)
Discussant: Nadine Weuschek (University of Muenster)
Abstract: This paper investigates the behavior of stock prices around the ex-dividend date in Europe over the period 2018-2022. In the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, an important fraction of firms cut, suspended or reduced their dividend payments, leading to a shortage. We find that the magnitude of abnormal returns is significantly larger during this period compared to regular times as dividend-seeking investors searched for the remaining payers. Our results are consistent with a price pressure explanation for the abnormal returns observed around the ex-date.
Public Funding and Financial Constraints – Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment
Presenter: Nadine Weuschek (University of Muenster)
Authors: Nadine Weuschek (University of Muenster)
Discussant: Dusan Isakov (University of Fribourg)
Abstract: I show that public funding significantly improves the financing situation of young firms by exploiting variation in access to public funding under the largest German regional policy scheme. My results based on a shock-based difference-in-differences research design indicate that the probability of experiencing financial constraints decreases by about 10% to 19% for treatment firms relative to control firms, depending on whether the funding instrument is a subsidized loan, a public loan guarantee, or a grant. The effect is heterogeneous not only across instruments but also across capital providers. In addition, I find that public funding is associated with higher employment and revenue growth, as well as higher research and development expenditures and, for recipient firms of grants, higher investment.
Crowdfunding
Room: Room 505
Chair: Loredana Ureche-Rangau (Université de Picardie Jules Verne)
Equity crowdfunding : campaign's attractiveness, underpricing and signaling
Presenter: stanislas quelin (Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1)
Authors: stanislas quelin (Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1)
Discussant: Guillaume Andrieu (Montpellier Business School)
Abstract: Our paper presents a theoretical framework of double-sided asymmetric information between an entrepreneur undertaking an equity crowdfunding campaign and crowdinvestors. First, the entrepreneur is imperfectly informed about the potential supply of funds from the crowd. Second, the crowd is heterogeneously informed about the quality of the project (sophisticated and ordinary investors can co-invest in the project). We show that (i) when the attractiveness (i.e., the ex-ante probability that the potential supply of funds is large) of the project is sufficiently low or high, good projects can signal themselves to ordinary investors by appropriately combining the level of the campaign's target and the financial compensation accruing to investors; (ii) the cost incurred by good projects (in comparison to first best) is inverted-U shaped with respect to the attractiveness of the project; and (iii) on the one hand, the participation of sophisticated investors is necessary for good projects to separate from bad projects but on the other hand, by diluting ordinary investors' equity stake in good projects in comparison to bad projects, sophisticated investors also generate additional underpricing of good projects, the level of which is increasing with their relative share among the crowd.
On the Substitution of Venture Capital by Equity Crowdfunding
Presenter: Guillaume Andrieu (Montpellier Business School)
Authors: Guillaume Andrieu (Montpellier Business School), Alexander Groh (LabEx Entreprendre, Montpellier)
Discussant: Imèn MOKRANI EL BOUGRINI (LEFMI - UPJV)
Abstract: Equity crowdfunding (CF) emerged as a financing source for entrepreneurs and competes with early-stage finance professionals, e.g., venture capital (VC) investors (VCs). Entrepreneurs need to decide from who to raise capital and we theorize about this fi- nancing choice. We model two financing stages where both types of investors compete. Either one has competitive advantages with respect to transaction cost, support quality, the efficiency of transaction monitoring, venture valuation, and taking the abandonment decision. Our model predicts the entrepreneur’s preferred source of funding contingent on these parameters, and the expected venture value. It provides several empirical pre- dictions, with a fierce competition in the entrepreneurial finance market being one of them: VCs will be forced to build up and to rely on strong expertise, to specialize, or to move to later financing stages.
New insights in reward crowdfunding: Stretch goal vs. sponsor experience
Presenter: Imèn MOKRANI EL BOUGRINI (LEFMI - UPJV)
Authors: Imèn MOKRANI EL BOUGRINI (LEFMI - UPJV), Loredana Ureche-Rangau (LEFMI - UPJV), Elias ERRAGRAGUI (LEFMI - UPJV)
Discussant: stanislas quelin (Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1)
Abstract: This paper focuses on the impact of the initial characteristics of a crowdfunding campaign, in particular the definition of the funding goal and the previous experience of the project sponsor, on the probability of a successful campaign on the Ulule reward-crowdfunding platform. We hypothesize that these two factors have a positive influence on reaching and even exceeding the initial goal. Our results confirm these hypotheses and suggest that the project owner's previous successful experience has a greater impact than the definition of a stretch goal, particularly in terms of reducing information asymmetry. This study contributes to the ongoing debate on stretch goals through a quantitative approach based on a sample of 33,041 projects submitted to the platform between 2012 and 2018.
Financial Strategies and Risk Management
Room: Room 506
Chair: Marie-Hélène Broihanne (LaRGE - EM Strasbourg)
Rediscovering Price Discovery
Presenter: Julien Ling (Collège de France)
Authors: Delphine Lautier (PSL Research University Paris-Dauphine), Julien Ling (Collège de France), Bertrand Villeneuve (PSL Research University Paris-Dauphine)
Discussant: Marie-Hélène Broihanne (LaRGE - EM Strasbourg)
Abstract: We propose a comprehensive structural analysis that generalizes and categorizes numerous existing models. Our approach is characterized by minimal assumptions, offering a flexible and fully identified model that enables economic interpretations and empirical applications. Building upon this theoretical foundation, we introduce a novel measure of price discovery: the Covariance Information Share (CovIS). Quite intuitively, the CovIS is the covariance between the shocks on observed market prices and the permanent shocks that impact the common efficient price. Our measure accommodates the investigation of low frequency data and correlated residuals. It also proves to be well-suited for both static and dynamic analyses of the price discovery process. We compare the CovIS measure with well-known information shares and connect dots between works that have hardly been related to each others up to now. This enables us to resolve some of the paradoxes raised by the conflicting findings sometimes encountered in empirical studies. Moreover, failures with known methods are reanalyzed as informative features. Finally, we apply our measure to both simulated and real data and revisit previous empirical studies.
Within household savings goals and wealth allocation: Evidence in retail banking
Presenter: Marie-Hélène Broihanne (LaRGE - EM Strasbourg)
Authors: Marie-Hélène Broihanne (LaRGE - EM Strasbourg), Hava ORKUT (LaRGE - EM Strasbourg)
Discussant: SELIM MANKAI (University of Clermont Auvergne)
Abstract: In this paper, we examine the savings goals of both partners in 9,523 couples of retail bank clients using a rich database extracted from a real-life banking environment. Our findings show that while financial goals within couples are largely shared within couples, some goals are not. We build a goal dissimilarity index to quantify the degree to which spouses differ in their selected savings goals. The results show that goal dissimilarity in a couple is positively associated with household wealth allocation. Interestingly, spouses with partially dissimilar goals are significantly more likely to accumulate wealth, particularly in risky assets, and that this wealth is predominantly contributed by the husband. We show that these results are potentially driven by assimilation between spouses. Our findings suggest that having shared savings goals is necessary as to positively influence overall household wealth. These results are consistent across robustness checks.
Is the Lack of Deterrence Undermining Mandatory Investment in Flood Risk Mitigation?
Authors: SELIM MANKAI (University of Clermont Auvergne)
Discussant: Julien Ling (Collège de France)
Abstract: How do contextual factors influence households to comply with recommended protective measures against extreme climate risks? This study examines the willingness of homeowners in flood-prone areas to undertake mandatory flood prevention measures. We extend the traditional framework of prevention motivation to include new external determinants, encompassing perceived stringency of regulation enforcement and social influence. Our results, grounded in survey data, show that perceived deterrence emerges as a significant driver of compliance intention. Social influence also has a strong impact on individual compliance decisions, which partially mediate the deterrence effect. To bolster household-level protective measures, we advocate for a two-pronged approach: strengthening the dependability of inspection and promoting prevention measures effectiveness. These strategies should have the potential to rebalance the existing incentive architecture and align individual interests with public risk mitigation objectives.
Entrepreneurial and Family Business Finance
Room: Room 507
Chair: Nicolas Eugster (The University of Queensland)
THE POWER OF EXPRESSED HUMILITY: EARLY-STAGE INVESTORS' REACTION TO HUMBLE ENTREPRENEURS
Presenter: Ivana Vitanova (Université Lyon 2)
Authors: Laurent Vilanova (Université Lyon 2), Ivana Vitanova (Université Lyon 2)
Discussant: Nicolas Eugster (The University of Queensland)
Abstract: We examine how entrepreneur-expressed humility affects early-stage investors’ willingness to fund a new venture. While leader humility has been shown to yield positive outcomes inside organizations, little is known about its effect on external resource providers. Drawing upon social exchange theory, we propose and test a dual path moderated mediation model that posits that entrepreneur humility positively affects investors’ willingness to fund. The findings of a randomized field experiment show that early-stage investors sense stronger interpersonal affect and trust and perceive higher team-building qualities for humble entrepreneurs. They are, in turn, more willing to fund entrepreneurs who display humility.
Family Firms and Carbon Emissions
Presenter: Nicolas Eugster (The University of Queensland)
Authors: Nicolas Eugster (The University of Queensland), Marcin Borsuk (Institute of Economics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland), Paul-Olivier Klein (University of Lyon, France), Oskar Kowaleski (IESEG School of Management)
Discussant: Armin Schweinbacher (SKEMA)
Abstract: This study examines the relationship between family firms and carbon emissions using a large cross-country dataset of 6,610 non-financial companies over the period 2010-2019. We document that family firms emit lower levels of carbon, both direct and indirect, compared to non-family firms. This points to a stronger commitment to environmental protection among family firms. Differences in governance structure, familial values, and higher R&D expenditures partly explain our results. Paradoxically, we find that family firms and family CEOs commit less publicly to a reduction in their carbon emissions and have lower ESG scores, although emitting less carbon. This suggests a lower participation in the public display of such an outcome and a lower tendency to greenwashing.
Entrepreneurial Overoptimism and Access to External Financing
Presenter: Armin Schweinbacher (SKEMA Business School – Université Côte d’Azur)
Authors: Hava Orkut (EM Strasbourg Business School – University of Strasbourg), Armin Schweinbacher (SKEMA Business School – Université Côte d’Azur)
Discussant: Ivana Vitanova (Université Lyon 2)
Abstract: We study the extent to which nascent entrepreneurs are overoptimistic about their capacity to obtain certain sources of funding when starting a new entrepreneurial venture. We find that overoptimism has a particularly significant, negative impact on institutional sources, such as banks and venture capital, suggesting that these entities are better at identifying overoptimistic entrepreneurs. In contrast, we find no effect on informal sources such as friends & family. We obtain similar insights into the amount eventually raised, suggesting that the reduced access to funding sources also has an impact on their fundraising capacity of entrepreneurs as compared to their initial funding objective. These different results are consistent with the assumption that entrepreneurs are overoptimistic from the beginning.
Portfolio & Asset Management I
Room: Room 510
Chair: Rodolphe Vanderveken (UCLouvain)
To Sell or Not to Sell? Disposition Effect and Investment Style
Presenter: Can Yilanci (University of Mannheim)
Authors: Can Yilanci (University of Mannheim)
Discussant: Rodolphe Vanderveken (UCLouvain)
Abstract: I show that investors implementing a value strategy as in Fama and French (1993) inevitably exhibit a disposition effect. Value investors must hold on to "loser" stocks and sell "winner" stocks. Consequently, I find a strong disposition effect for value funds but I find no disposition effect for growth funds. Focusing on a subsample of managers who manage value and growth funds at the same time, I find that these managers show a disposition effect for their value funds but no disposition effect for their growth funds. I make similar findings when focusing on a sample of passive index funds. My findings imply that professional investors might be prone to the disposition effect because they follow specific investment styles.
Optimal Diversification with Parameter Uncertainty
Presenter: Rodolphe Vanderveken (UCLouvain)
Authors: Rodolphe Vanderveken (UCLouvain), Nathan Lassance (UCLouvain), Frédéric Vrins (UCLouvain)
Discussant: Mohamad Hassan Abou Daya (Grenoble Ecole de Management)
Abstract: Conventional investment wisdom advocates that investors should be well diversified, i.e., invest in as many assets as possible. We show instead that due to estimation errors in the inputs of portfolio strategies, the optimal level of diversification strikes a trade-off between accessing additional investment opportunities and limiting estimation risk, and thus is finite and can be relatively small. We also propose a set of procedures to select which assets are part of the restricted investment universe. Empirically, we show that limiting diversification with our method substantially outperforms unrestricted portfolios and makes portfolio theory valuable even in high-dimensional settings.
Smart Contract Tontines
Presenter: Mohamad Hassan Abou Daya (Grenoble Ecole de Management)
Authors: Mohamad Hassan Abou Daya (Grenoble Ecole de Management), Carole Bernard (Grenoble Ecole de Management)
Discussant: Can Yilanci (University of Mannheim)
Abstract: When entering into a tontine, the value of the tontine for the participant highly depends on its composition. However, participants subscribe to the scheme without any knowledge of either the composition of the tontine, or, in some cases, its exact payout scheme. Herein, we quantify the value of this information using a theoretical approach that allows us to obtain bounds on the tontine value subject to uncertainty in certain characteristics. We then propose a smart contract that offers full disclosure of information in a tontine. We discuss the practical implementation of such a tontine and present some new risks that could arise.
Sustainable Finance I
Room: Room 511
Chair: Frederique Bouwman (Open University Heerlen)
The Shareholder Base of Green Bond Issuers at the Dawn of Anti-ESG Movement
Presenter: Diana Pop (Université d'Angers (GRANEM))
Authors: Diana Pop (Université d'Angers (GRANEM))
Discussant: Frederique Bouwman (Open University Heerlen)
Abstract: The transparency around the inclination towards sustainability of institutional investors is becoming a double edge sword. This study provides empirical evidence that the non-financial corporations which disclose the identity of the investors who subscribed their green and ESG bond issues are able, on average, to attract more shareholders than those with opaque bond holdings. It also shows that knowing the identity of a short list of large investors under the pressure of political sanctions have an impact on the decisions to trade of small-sized institutional and retail investors. I use the announcement of the governor of Florida from July 27, 2022 about its intention to ban BlackRock, as well as the subsequent anti-ESG events to identify which asset managers and financial institutions were blocked because of their environmental engagements. However, with a coverage spanning from September 2015 till the end of 2022, the empirical results reveal the shareholder base reshape of green issuers only in the early stage of the anti-ESG movement.
Pay-checks with a Purpose: Exploring the Link between CEO Compensation and Corporate Sustainability
Presenter: Frederique Bouwman (Open University Heerlen)
Authors: Dennis Bams (Maastricht University), Frederique Bouwman (Open University Heerlen), Bart Frijns (Open University Heerlen)
Discussant: Fidèle Shukuru Balume (University Jean Moulin Lyon 3, iaelyon, Magellan)
Abstract: This study explores the impact of CEO compensation structure on corporate sustainability practices. Prior research shows that incorporating CSR metrics into compensation packages does not contribute to material improvements in CSR outcomes, a finding that we confirm. Our study delves deeper into which compensation attributes effectively enhance substantial sustainability strategies. By distinguishing between cash and equity components of CEO compensation, we examine their influence on CSR intentions and CSR outcomes. We argue that given the presence of information asymmetry and investor opacity, the market tends to appreciate symbolic corporate sustainability gestures, whereas significant sustainability investments may not be promptly recognized as value-enhancing. This dynamic may discourage CEOs from allocating resources to enhance the firm's substantial environmental performance. Employing an empirical approach, we discover that equity compensation is indeed negatively related to environmental outcomes. Furthermore, at a detailed level, it exhibits positive associations with environmental intentions, social intentions, social outcomes, and an ESG score, typically associated with sustainability initiatives characterized by short-term horizons and moderate costs. In contrast, cash incentives show a positive relationship with environmental outcomes, particularly concerning long-term, resource-intensive sustainability investments. These findings challenge the conventional assumption that equity compensation invariably promotes CEOs' long-term perspectives, as it appears not to hold for sustainability investments.
Does the LBO Deal Affect the Firm's ESG Commitment in Financial Distress Situation ?
Presenter: Fidèle Shukuru Balume (University Jean Moulin Lyon 3, iaelyon, Magellan)
Authors: Fidèle Shukuru Balume (University Jean Moulin Lyon 3, iaelyon, Magellan), Jean-François Gajewski (University Jean Moulin Lyon 3, IAELyon, Magellan), Tao-Hsien Dolly King (Belk College of Business, University of North Carolina at Charlotte)
Discussant: Diana Pop (Université d'Angers (GRANEM))
Abstract: This paper examines how the leverage buyout deal and the subsequent increase in the financial distress risk (FDR) for firms under LBO affect the firm ESG commitment. A panel data analysis is applied on 182 buyouts and 500 comparable firms from USA between 2006-2022. The first result indicates that firms that are selected for buyout have a significantly higher social engagement and lower governance engagement prior to the LBO deal compared to the post-deal period. In addition, we observe a significant slowdown in the increase of the ESG commitment for buyouts compared to their peers in the post-deal period. The second result from a multivariate analysis indicates that neither the FDR nor the LBO deal (considered in isolation) affect the firm's ESG commitment. However, depending on its size and the increase of its FDR, the firm under LBO decreases its ESG commitment, i.e the bigger a firm under LBO is, the more likely the firm tends to reduce it's ESG commitment when facing with a higher financial distress risk. This result is specifically linked to firms under LBO, as when we run the same regression on comparable firms, we find no evidence of relation between the increase in the financial distress risk and ESG commitment of comparable firms depending on their size. Conversely, an increase in the risk of financial distress does not prevent comparable large firms from increasing their social commitment. Consistent with the salience theory, this study provides new empirical evidence of the wealth transfer hypothesis in buyouts.
16:30 - 18:00
Parallel Sessions V learn more
Market Behavior and Financial Education
Room: Room 501
Chair: Gulten MERO (CY Cergy Paris Université - THEMA UMR CNRS 8184)
Business cycle and realized losses in the consumer credit industry
Presenter: Frédéric Vrins (UCLouvain)
Authors: Frédéric Vrins (UCLouvain), Francesco Roccazzella (IESEG), Walter Distaso (Imperial College London)
Discussant: Guillaume Thévenet (University of Strasbourg)
Abstract: We study the determinants of the loss given default (LGD) of consumer credit. Exploiting a dataset including more than 6 million of Italian consumer loans from 2007 to 2019, we find that macroeconomic and social variables significantly enhance forecasting performance both at the individual and portfolio levels, by up to 10 percentage points in terms of R2. This result is robust across forecasting exercises and model specifications. In particular, non-linear forecast combination schemes relying on neural networks are among the best performers in terms of mean absolute error, RMSE, R2, and model confidence set in every considered exercise. The relationship between the expected LGD and the macro predictors unveiled by accumulated local effects plots confirms the intuition that lower real activity, increasing cost-of-debt to GDP ratio, and greater economic uncertainty are associated with a greater LGD for consumer credit.
Sentiment and Equity Return-Liquidity Relationship: Does Noise Trading Risk Matter?
Presenter: Gulten MERO (CY Cergy Paris Université - THEMA UMR CNRS 8184)
Authors: Gulten MERO (CY Cergy Paris Université - THEMA UMR CNRS 8184), Hermann Ngameni Ngankam (CY Cergy Paris Université - THEMA UMR CNRS 8184)
Discussant: Frédéric Vrins (UCLouvain)
Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the relationship between equity returns and illiquidity from the perspective of investor sentiment used as a proxy of noise trading risk. We rely on a novel internet-generated sentiment indicator introduced by Renault (2017) filtered from self-reported traders’ messages posted on Internet, which are collected from StockTwit platform. We find that there is a positive relationship between Amihud (2002) illiquidity measure and average daily returns of the Nasdaq Index as well as those of a selection of individual stocks belonging to the index. This positive correlation is nonlinear since it arises from high sentiment subperiods characterized by strongly significant and positive Amuhud betas while they become nonsignificant during low sentiment subperiods. In addition, the cross-sectional relationship between Amihud betas and expected stock returns becomes strongly significant during high sentiment dates supporting the idea that investors require higher risk premia to hold assets that are strongly correlated to the Amihud illiquiduity factor (i.e., characterized by higher Amihud betas). This supports the “noise trading risk” story (De Long et al., 1990; Shleifer and Vishny, 1997) implying that the unpredictability of noise traders’ mispricing and the limits of arbitrage it may induce, can explain why investors require higher average returns to hold more illiquid assets during high sentiment periods where noise traders are likely to be more active in the market.
We don’t need no financial education? Does the faculty of study influence students’ financial literacy? Evidence from French students
Presenter: Guillaume Thévenet (University of Strasbourg)
Authors: Guillaume Thévenet (University of Strasbourg), Anais Hamelin (University of Strasbourg)
Discussant: Gulten MERO (CY Cergy Paris Université - THEMA UMR CNRS 8184)
Abstract: Although several initiatives exist to improve financial literacy, people’s lack of financial literacy is still an unsolved problem. Financial literacy is an individual’s level of knowledge of baseline financial concepts. Among the different populations facing issues with financial literacy, students have been of primary interest in recent research. However, the issue of specific fragile populations among the student community remains unaddressed. This study aims to fill this gap by exploring the relationship between the faculty of study and students’ objective level of financial literacy, as well as students’ perceptions of their level of financial literacy. We use a sample of 7,121 university students. The results show that economics and business students overperform in terms of objective financial literacy, relative to other faculties’ students, whereas humanities students underperform. We also observe that social sciences and economics and business students are overconfident about their financial literacy.
Portfolio & Asset Management II
Room: Room 502
Chair: Felix Miebs (TH Köln)
Fund flows and investor concerns
Presenter: Céleste Hardy (HEC Liège - University of Liège)
Authors: Céleste Hardy (HEC Liège - University of Liège), Marie Lambert (HEC Liège - University of Liège), David Ardia (HEC Montréal), Keven Bluteau (Université de Sherbrooke)
Discussant: Felix Miebs (TH Köln)
Mutual Funds’ Investment Horizon and Destabilizing Behavior
Presenter: Xiaoyu Kang (Maastricht University)
Authors: Dennis Bams (w.bams@maastrichtuniversity.nl), Ali Ebrahimnejad (Sharif University of Technology), Xiaoyu Kang (Maastricht University), Hassan Tehranian (Boston College)
Discussant: Céleste Hardy (HEC Liège - University of Liège)
Abstract: We use a novel strategy to study the consequences of short investment horizons on institutional trading behavior and stock price inefficiency. Building on the previous literature that mutual funds’ holdings disclosure is important for fund managers and their investors, we show that during a stock crash, mutual funds whose next mandatory SEC-required reporting dates are closer, identified with shorter investment horizon, are more likely to divest from the stock. To rule out the possibility of funds selling and then buying the crash stock again, we leverage a comprehensive dataset from Thomson Reuters, which incorporates both public mandatory reports and non-public voluntary reports, allowing us to compare positions of funds with different upcoming mandatory reporting dates promptly following the stock crashes. We further examine the consequences of this short-termism induced by mandatory disclosures on stock prices. We find that stocks held mostly by “short-term” funds, at the time of the crash, experience a larger drop and a subsequent reversal. Our results shed light on how an exogenously extracted variation in investment horizon, associated with mandatory reporting, induces destabilizing behavior following crashes.
An averaging framework for minimum-variance portfolios: Optimal rules for combining portfolio weights
Presenter: Felix Miebs (TH Köln)
Authors: Roland Füss (Swiss Institute of Banking and Finance (s/bf), University of St. Gallen), Thorsten Glück (Wiesbaden Business School), Christian Köppel (University of St.Gallen), Felix Miebs (TH Köln)
Discussant: Xiaoyu Kang (Maastricht University)
Abstract: We propose an averaging framework for combining minimum-variance strategies to either minimize the expected out-of-sample variance or maximize the expected out-of-sample Sharpe ratio. Our framework overcomes the problem of selecting the “best” strategy ex-ante by optimally averaging over portfolio weights. This averaging procedure has an intuitive economic interpretation because it resembles a fund-of-fund approach, where each minimum-variance strategy represents a single fund. In a range of simulations, for a set of well-established strategies, we show that optimally averaging over portfolio weights improves the out-ofsample variance and Sharpe ratio. We confirm the finding of our simulation study on empirical data.
Sustainable Finance II
Room: Room 503
Chair: Philippe Bertrand (IAE Aix and KEDGE BS)
Responsible Shareholders and Debtholders: The Impact of Debt-Equity Holdings of SRI funds on Corporate Social Policies
Presenter: Yulia Titova (IESEG School of Management)
Authors: Yulia Titova (IESEG School of Management), Robert Joliet (IESEG School of Management)
Discussant: Alain Soliman (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, PRISM Sorbonne)
Sustainable Portfolio Management with Benchmark ? Let’s Have a Cigar !
Presenter: Philippe Bertrand (IAE Aix and KEDGE BS)
Authors: Jean-Luc Prigent (THEMA, CY Cergy Paris University), Philippe Bertrand (IAE Aix and KEDGE BS)
Discussant: Yulia Titova (IESEG School of Management)
Abstract: Nowadays, investors are increasingly taking environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations into account in their investment process when composing their portfolios. In doing so, they need to find the right compromise between promoting ESG while not sacrificing too much of the profitability of their investments. In addition, the use of a benchmark portfolio is now a common practice in the financial management industry. In this context, the portfolio manager seeks to beat a benchmark index. Then the relevant concept of risk is relative risk as defined by tracking-error volatility (TEV) which needs to to be controlled. The problem of minimizing the volatility of tracking error was originally solved by Roll (1992) and then extended by Jorion (2003). In this paper, we extend Jorion's model by integrating ESG scores as a new constraint in the portfolio optimization problem. We explicitly solve this optimization problem and analyze the properties of the solution. Starting with a given benchmark, we show that it is possible in most cases to improve the situation of a managed portfolio on the three dimensions considered: expected return, volatility and ESG score.
Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe : Impact on the Idiosyncratic Volatility
Presenter: Alain Soliman (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, PRISM Sorbonne)
Authors: Alain Soliman (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, PRISM Sorbonne), Erwan LE SAOUT (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, PRISM Sorbonne)
Discussant: Philippe Bertrand (IAE Aix and KEDGE BS)
Abstract: The idiosyncratic volatility reflects specific information related to firms. Classical theories of finance mostly present mainly the interests of shareholders but not all stakeholders. Recent studies show that the idiosyncratic volatility is priced in the cross-section of expected returns proving its significance. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is considered as the self-regulating model that helps firms to be more socially engaged to the public and different categories of stakeholders. The firm’s practice of CSR by adopting and respecting environmental and social governance codes should have an impact on its idiosyncratic volatility. In this article, we are studying the relationship between the firm’s CSR performance and its idiosyncratic volatility in Europe. Using panel data models, we document that improved CSR is skeptically affecting the Idiosyncratic volatility for the period of January 2003 to June 2018.
Market Microstructure
Room: Room 505
Chair: Stéphanie Ligot (University Paris 1 Panthéon – Sorbonne (PRISM Sorbonne))
Trade Co-occurrence, Trade Flow Decomposition, and Conditional Order Imbalance in Equity Markets
Presenter: Yutong Lu (University of Oxford)
Authors: Yutong Lu (University of Oxford)
Discussant: Stéphanie Ligot (University Paris 1 Panthéon – Sorbonne (PRISM Sorbonne))
Abstract: The time proximity of high-frequency trades can contain a salient signal. In this paper, we propose a method to classify every trade, based on its proximity with other trades in the market within a short period of time, into five types. By means of a suitably defined normalized order imbalance associated to each type of trade, which we denote as conditional order imbalance (COI), we investigate the price impact of the decomposed trade flows. Our empirical findings indicate strong positive correlations between contemporaneous returns and COIs. In terms of predictability, we document that associations with future returns are positive for COIs of trades which are isolated from trades of stocks other than themselves, and negative otherwise. Furthermore, trading strategies which we develop using COIs achieve conspicuous returns and Sharpe ratios, in an extensive experimental setup on a universe of 457 stocks using daily data for a period of four years.
How did the French Securities Transaction Tax Affect the Delay of Information Incorporation into Prices?
Presenter: Ahmad Chokor (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble IAE - INP, CERAG, 38000 Grenoble France)
Authors: Ahmad Chokor (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble IAE - INP, CERAG, 38000 Grenoble France), Sonia Jimenez-Garces (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, CERAG, 38000 Grenoble France)
Discussant: Yutong Lu (University of Oxford)
Abstract: In August 2012, France has introduced a Security Transaction Tax (STT) that charges 20 basis points on the purchase of shares issued by French companies with a market capitalization that exceeds 1 billion euros. At the European level, there have been contradicting points of views that lead to the delay in the adoption of such tax. Recently, there has been a European tendency to adopt a tax similar to the one applied in France. As pointed out by the literature the implementation of such a tax on financial transactions in France has had a wide range of effects on the quality of financial markets. While the impact of the STT on microstructure variables has been deeply analyzed, there is still a need for research about the externality of this tax for stock prices informativeness. Do rational investors who observe market prices in order to extract some information about the future payoffs of risky stocks manage to learn more rapidly the relevant news since the implementation of the STT? The global objective of our paper is to answer this question which naturally raises since the objective of the STT was to favor informational trading over pure speculative one. We consider the Price Delay measure of Hou and Moskowitz (2005) for appraising the delay with which stock prices embed new information about global market news. Thanks to a difference-in-differences analysis considering alternatively the DAX 30 German stocks and the MIB Italian stocks as control groups, we show that the French STT has delayed the process of information incorporation into prices for taxable stocks.
Circuit Breakers and Market Quality in High Frequency Markets
Presenter: Stéphanie Ligot (University Paris 1 Panthéon – Sorbonne (PRISM Sorbonne))
Authors: Iryna Veryzhenko Leboeuf (Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (CNAM) de Paris (LIRSA)), Stéphanie Ligot (University Paris 1 Panthéon – Sorbonne (PRISM Sorbonne)), Roland Gillet (University Paris 1 Panthéon – Sorbonne (PRISM Sorbonne) & Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management (CEBRIG))
Discussant: Ahmad Chokor (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble IAE - INP, CERAG, 38000 Grenoble France)
Abstract: This study investigates the efficacy of short-term circuit breakers as a regulatory instrument in financial markets. We evaluate their capacity to mitigate significant price fluctuations and mitigate panic-driven trading by examining the shifts in behavior among market participants, including pure-HFT, mix-HFT, and non-HFT entities. Our analysis focuses on tracking their liquidity provision and consumption during both calm market periods and specific turbulent episodes leading to trading halts. The dataset comprises High-Frequency data encompassing trades and orders (all messages) for the most liquid stocks within the SBF120 French index from January 4, 2016, to December 28, 2016. Our findings reveal that non-HFTs and mix-HFTs assume the role of liquidity providers, effectively leveraging trading halts to temper price movements. These protected trader categories initiate a reversal in trends. Surprisingly, HFTs cease functioning as market-makers and instead execute more aggressive trades in the direction of the prevailing trend, complicating market recovery. In summary, our results indicate that relying solely on circuit breakers may not be sufficient to dissuade all traders from following market trends and, consequently, to avert a potential market crash. Regulatory authorities should consider designing real-time tools to manage order flow toxicity. We provide evidence supporting the development of contracts based on VPIN as a viable alternative to ensure market stabilization during periods of heightened volatility.
Venture Capital
Room: Room 506
Chair: Alexander Groh (LabEx Entreprendre, Montpellier)
Power Laws & VC Returns: Implications for Venture Capital Portfolio Size
Presenter: Pia Helbing (The University of Edinburgh)
Authors: Axel Buchner (ESCP Berlin), Ronan Gallagher (The University of Edinburgh), Pia Helbing (The University of Edinburgh), Filippo Menolascina (The University of Edinburgh), Abdul Mohamed (University of Leeds)
Discussant: Alexander Groh (LabEx Entreprendre, Montpellier)
Abstract: This study offers novel insights into the determination of the underlying distribution of venture capital (VC) returns. Using an exhaustive dataset on VC returns from 1985-2017, we identify VC returns to be power-law distributed for our entire sample, but also across deal status, stage and region. Conventional return distributions such as student’s t or normal cannot capture any salient features of the return data. This has implications for the determination of optimal portfolio size. We are able derive optimal portfolio sizes for different return outcomes in a multi-objective optimization problem.
Dynamics of Climate tech venture capital fundraising following the Paris Agreement: A pathway to climate-resilient development
Presenter: Huy Hoang Dang (ESC Clermont Business School)
Authors: Huy Hoang Dang (ESC Clermont Business School), Aymen Turki (ESC Clermont Business School)
Discussant: Pia Helbing (The University of Edinburgh)
Abstract: In the midst of ongoing debates about the effectiveness of the Paris Agreement (PA) in addressing climate change, this study examines its impact on the fundraising dynamics of Climate tech venture capital (VC). We conducted an interrupted time series analysis using the most comprehensive and qualitatively optimal dataset collected so far, encompassing Climate tech VC fundraising activity from January 2005 to September 2023. Climate tech funds were selected on the basis of three criteria derived from the PA and research on the potential factors contributing to the Cleantech bubble. Our findings indicate that the PA has induced a clear acceleration in the growth of the number of Climate tech VC funds and a more limited effect on fundraising amounts. However, the average size of such dedicated VC has remained stagnant, along with its contribution to the overall funding of Climate tech startups. Addressing these two issues could make climate funding consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development.
The Impact of Natural Disasters on Venture Capital Activity and Success
Presenter: Alexander Groh (LabEx Entreprendre, Montpellier)
Authors: Alexander Groh (LabEx Entreprendre, Montpellier), Giang Nguyen (Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan), Thu Ha Nguyen (Monash University, Caulfield East, Australia)
Discussant: Huy Hoang Dang (ESC Clermont Business School)
Abstract: We document a significant decrease in venture capital (VC) activity in regions hit by climate change induced natural disasters. The detected impact is robust to different empirical settings at the VC firm- and venture-level, and to alternative definitions and measures of disasters and their damage. Furthermore, disasters affected VC-backed ventures have lower patent outputs, propensity to raise follow-on funding, and survival rate s. The effect decays over time unless another catastrophe strikes. The analyses provide evidence that VC-backed ventures are substantially exposed to climate risk.
08:30 - 10:00
PhD Workshop Parrallel Session I learn more
Banking and Finance I
Room: Room 501
Chair: Hans Degryse (KU Leuven)
Inside debt, bonus caps, and risk taking in banks
Presenter: Natalija Kostic (Vienna University of Economics and Business)
Authors: Natalija Kostic (Vienna University of Economics and Business)
Discussant: Hans Degryse (KU Leuven)
Abstract: Including unsecured inside debt in compensation contracts of bank managers, as well as capping their bonuses, are some of the rules that regulators propose in an effort to limit risk taking of banks. I show that mandatory unsecured inside debt does not always decrease and in some cases even increases bank risk when implemented in isolation. The joint effect of bonus caps and inside debt can either lead to an increase or a decrease in bank risk, depending on the type of the bonus cap.
The Politics of Bank Lending: Empirical Evidence from Brown Borrowers
Presenter: Clara Zhe Wang (University of Bristol)
Authors: Ruby Brownen- Trinh (University of Bristol), Neslihan Ozkan (University of Bristol), Clara Zhe Wang (University of Bristol), Junyang Yin (Heriot-Watt University )
Discussant: Joel Petey (Univ of Strasbourg)
Abstract: This study examines the interplay between banks’ political connection and lending to brown borrowers, i.e. borrowers with poor environmental performance. A bank’s political connection is captured based on whether a bank is headquartered in the state with a member from the U.S. Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee. Using data from DealScan from 1995-2020, we show that banks headquartered in states with a Banking Committee senator provide cheaper loans to brown borrowers than banks without a Banking Committee senator in their headquarters state. This finding suggests that politically connected banks can play a significant role in delaying the green transition as they extend loans to brown firms at a low rate. In addition, we show that the effect of a bank’s political connection on the cost of lending to brown borrowers is more pronounced when the senator is senior or when borrowers, lenders, and banking committee senators are in the same state. Overall, we provide novel evidence on how the political connections of banks influence their lending to brown firms.
Behavioral Finance I
Room: Room 502
Chair: Philippe Rozin (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Stress index strategy enhanced with financial news sentiment analysis for the equity markets
Presenter: Baptiste Lefort (CentraleSupélec, Ai For Alpha)
Authors: Baptiste Lefort (CentraleSupélec, Ai For Alpha), Eric Benhamou (Ai For Alpha ), Jean-Jacques Ohana (Ai For Alpha ), David Saltiel (Ai For Alpha), Beatrice Guez (Ai For Alpha ), Thomas Jacquot (Ai For Alpha )
Discussant: Jean-Yves Filbien (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Abstract: This paper introduces a new risk-on risk-off strategy for the stock market, which com- bines a financial stress indicator with a sentiment analysis done by ChatGPT reading and interpreting Bloomberg daily market summaries. Forecasts of market stress derived from volatility and credit spreads are enhanced when combined with the financial news sentiment derived from GPT4. As a result, the strategy shows improved performance, evidenced by higher Sharpe ratio and reduced maximum drawdowns. The improved performance is consistent across the NASDAQ, the S&P 500 and the six major equity markets, indicating that the method generalises across equities markets.
A RE-EXAMINATION OF HERDING BEHAVIOURS ON CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS
Presenter: Christine Jeanneaux (ESDES, Lyon, France / Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, CERAG, 38000 Grenoble France)
Authors: Christine Jeanneaux (ESDES, Lyon, France / Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, CERAG, 38000 Grenoble France), Elise Alfieri (Université Paris Est Créteil, IRG, (EA 2354), 94010 Créteil, France), Radu Burlacu (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, CERAG, 38000 Grenoble France), Sonia Jimenez-Garces (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, CERAG, 38000 Grenoble France)
Discussant: Philippe Rozin (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Abstract: Our research introduces a novel perspective for evaluating Cross-Sectional Absolute Standard Deviation (CSAD) and Cross-Sectional Standard Deviation of Returns (CSSD). We specifically focus on the gap existing between realized and expected returns on cryptocurrency markets employing the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and informational factors for expected returns calculation. This stands in contrast to the current methodologies as much of the current literature primarily concentrates on analyzing the difference between realized returns and market returns (R_m). Our study shows interesting results when comparing methodologies on the CSSD approach. Notably, we observe significant results indicating the presence of herding behaviors during downturns in the cryptocurrency market. However, our findings are more nuanced in the context of the CSAD model as our results show a lesser degree of significance. These findings contribute to the evolving landscape of financial analysis in the cryptocurrency sector, challenging traditional methodologies and paving the way for further exploration in the crypto-herding field.
The effect of Reddit sentiment and disagreement on Bitcoin and Ethereum volatility
Presenter: Pierre Fay (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Authors: Fredj Jawadi (IAE Lille University School of Management), David Bourghelle (IAE Lille University School of Management), Pierre Fay (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Discussant: Christophe Pérignon (HEC)
Abstract: This study aims to investigate whether disagreement can help to forecast Bit- coin and Ethereum volatility for both intraday and daily frequency. To this end, we collected daily and hourly data over the period 2018-2022. Further, unlike the previ- ous literature, we use the standard deviation of sentiment in Reddit comments as a disagreement proxy. For Bitcoin and Ethereum and for hourly and daily frequency, we first study the relationships between our variable and the realized volatility and second, we evaluate the forecasting performance of our model. Econometri- cally, we introduced an adapted linear Heterogeneous Autoregressive (HAR-RV-X) model augmented with sentiment and disagreement variables to specify the effect of sentiment and disagreement on bitcoin volatility. Our study yielded Four main results. First, we found that disagreement can help to forecast Bitcoin volatility at daily frequency but not at hourly frequency. Second, for both cryptocurrencies, when the sentiment is separated into two components, coefficient remains positive. Third, only the negative component of the sentiment was highly significant for both daily and hourly frequency suggesting a ”negativity bias” among Bitcoin and Ethereum investors. Fourth, the effect of sentiment on realized volatility is stronger for Bitcoin than for Ethereum.
Corporate Finance
Room: Room 503
Chair: Nihat Aktas (WHU)
Did Intangible Assets Improve Corporate Resilience to Hurricane Sandy?
Presenter: Phuong Tram Anh LE (Université Clermont Auvergne)
Authors: Phuong Tram Anh LE (Université Clermont Auvergne), Brice FOULON (Université Clermont Auvergne)
Discussant: Pia Helbing (The University of Edinburgh)
Abstract: Natural disasters pose a significant and ever-present threat to businesses globally. These catastrophic events, ranging from hurricanes and earthquakes to floods and wildfires, can wreak havoc on firms, jeopardizing their operations, assets, and profitability. In this study, we investigate whether the accumulation of intangible assets helps mitigate the adverse effects of natural disasters on firm performance. Using a unique dataset of 378 U.S companies affected by Hurricane Sandy, and survival analysis methodology, we empirically find that firm's pre-disaster intangible assets serve to alleviate the negative impact on stock prices and firm performance. In particular, our study highlights the pivotal role of intangible assets in shielding both firms and investors from the shocks induced by Hurricane Sandy. Moreover, our results remain robust across various survival analysis models and time frames. Finally, we contribute to the growing body of firm resilience literature by emphasizing intangible assets as a means for companies to enhance their resilience in the face of natural catastrophes.
Corporate Lobbying versus CER: Greasing or sanding the wheels?
Presenter: Islem MBAREK (University of Montpellier, France / Higher Institute of Management of Tunis, Tunisia)
Authors: Islem MBAREK (University of Montpellier, France / Higher Institute of Management of Tunis, Tunisia), Ouidad YOUSFI (University of Montpellier, France ), Abdelwahed OMRI (Higher Institute of Management of Tunis, Tunisia)
Discussant: Thomas Lambert (Univ of Rotterdam)
Governance Reform, Agency Costs and Firm Performance: Evidence from CEO and Chairman Separation
Presenter: Ruichen Wang (Toulouse School of Management)
Authors: Ruichen Wang (Toulouse School of Management)
Discussant: Ryan Williams (Université Paris Dauphine - PSL)
Green and Responsible Finance I
Room: Room 505
Chair: Christophe Revelli (Kedge Business School)
Heat Distributed Unequally in the Sovereign Bond Market
Presenter: Azzam Santosa (Ghent University)
Authors: Azzam Santosa (Ghent University), Thomas Lebbe (Ghent University)
Discussant: Marion Dupire (IESEG Lille - LEM)
Abstract: This paper investigates the implications of heat shocks on sovereign bonds. By extending a sovereign default model to include heat shocks, the research examines the effect of heat shocks on default risk, bond spreads and debt levels. The main finding is that heat shocks is associated with increased default risk and bond spreads. The mechanism is empirically tested on a global sample of sovereign bonds and CDS spreads, revealing that heat shocks tend to widen sovereign bonds and CDS spreads for Emerging Markets but not for Advanced Markets. The results highlights an important externality of global warming: most of the stock of $CO_2$ equivalent emissions has historically been generated by Advanced Markets but in the sovereign bond market Emerging Markets are bearing the burden.
The Relationship Between Financial Inclusion and Environmental Quality
Presenter: Oumaima Sahtout (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Authors: Oumaima Sahtout (IAE Lille University School of Management), Fredj Jawadi (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Discussant: Armin Schweinbacher (SKEMA)
Abstract: This paper extends environmental research from a financial perspective, providing a better understanding of the relationship between financial inclusion and carbon emissions, as well as more explicit policy implications. The aim is to examine the impact of financial inclusion on CO2 emissions using two country samples: developing and developed countries, over the period 2004-2021. The ARDL (autoregressive distributive lag) model was used to estimate an extended STIRPAT model for long-term linkages. The multidimensional inclusion index was constructed on four dimensions using principal component analysis (PCA) based on standardized variables. The results show a rebound effect for developed countries, with financial inclusion limiting carbon emissions in the short term but increasing them in the long term. For developing countries, the results show that financial inclusion has a positive and significant effect only in the long term. In addition, our study examines the impact of CO2 in neighboring countries on a specific country's CO2 levels, underlining the crucial importance of considering the regional aspect in environmental analysis. The results of this study aim to help policy-makers integrate financial inclusion into climate change adaptation strategies at local, national and regional levels, and to integrate environmental criteria into financial policies while underlining the need to share best practices in environmental policies.
Quantitative Finance
Room: Room 506
Chair: Mikaël Petitjean (UcL)
The five-step tango (plus or minus two): emergent rhythm and information in algorithmic trading patterns
Presenter: Laurent Pataillot (Audencia Business School, GATE UMR 5824)
Authors: Laurent Pataillot (Audencia Business School, GATE UMR 5824), Iordanis Kalaitzoglou (Audencia Business School), Brice Corgnet (Emlyon Business School, GATE UMR 5824)
Discussant: Fredj Jawadi (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Abstract: As financial markets have undergone a complete shift to a fully electronic format, their microstructure has transformed into an algorithmic paradigm, where the pursuit of speed is paramount for gaining a competitive edge in information acquisition. At ultra-short time scales, market activity can be decomposed into several layers of events happening on interacting exchanges, each contributing to the jumps from state to state of a global order book. We model the aggregated result as a superposition of Hawkes processes for 500 stocks traded on 14 US exchanges over a period of four years and find that, regardless of the asset, the market as a whole always diffuses information in clusters of five events on average, despite the steady increase of exogenous input over the years. We relate these findings to universal rhythmic rules and cognitive theories such as ’Miller’s law’ and the El Farol bar problem, and discuss our contribution to the literature claiming that markets operate at a near-critical state, as do all complex systems.
Time Series Reversal: A Payment Cycle Friction
Presenter: giuliano graziani (Bocconi University)
Authors: giuliano graziani (Bocconi University)
Discussant: Lin Ma (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Abstract: This paper shows that the aggregate U.S. equity market reverts in one month the non-informational price pressure induced by the end-of-month payment cycle. In contrast to cross-sectional evidence, the market-level reversal is robust to transaction costs and out-of-sample tests as it concentrates on liquid and high-priced stocks and during expansion periods. The findings lead to a novel interpretation of reversal: the pattern measures the liquidity not efficiently provided in the market rather than investors' cognitive bias or compensation for market-making.
Bond recovery rates: a tale of two uncertainties
Presenter: Matteo Barbagli (UCLouvain)
Authors: Matteo Barbagli (UCLouvain), Pascal François (HEC Montréal), Geneviève Gauthier (HEC Montréal), Frédéric Vrins (UCLouvain)
Discussant: David Verstraete (IAE Lille - University school of management)
Abstract: Identifying the drivers of bond’s recovery rates is an important and topical field of research. In spite of its obvious connections with recovery rates, credit default swap (CDS) spreads received little attention for this purpose. In this paper, we introduce two novel recovery rates determinants built from CDS market data. These dynamic indices capture the level and uncertainty information embedded in CDS spreads aggregated by industry sectors, thereby forming a new family of determinants sitting in between the idiosyncratic and systematic factors identified so far. Analyzing 613 defaulted U.S. corporate bond issues from 2006 to 2019 and using a beta regression model, we find the cross-sectional mean and approximate entropy of aggregated CDS spreads to be significant to explain the mean and dispersion parameters of the beta distribution underlying recovery rates. These findings offer valuable insights for improving credit risk assessment methodologies and identifying key risk drivers of recovery rates prior to running prediction models.
10:15 - 11:45
PhD Workshop Parrallel Session II learn more
Banking and Finance II
Room: Room 501
Chair: Anais Hamelin (Univ of Strasbourg)
Impact of Contribution Remittances on Retirement Savings in Contributory Pension Schemes
Presenter: Yahaya Joshua Shagaya (Universite Grenoble Alpes)
Authors: Yahaya Joshua Shagaya (Universite Grenoble Alpes)
Discussant: Giang Vu (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Abstract: In this article, we delve into the critical question: What happens to the retirement savings account (RSA) balance of a contributory pension scheme (CPS) when contributions are remitted partially or non-remitted during various accumulation phases? Our analysis focuses on understanding the differences in contribution remittances and their impact on the accumulated RSA balance within a CPS model. We introduce a counterfactual scenario that incorporates partial and non-remittances of contributions through adjustments in contribution rate parameters. Utilising Nigerian data, we analyse how these variations in funding scenarios affect the final RSA balance. Our findings show that non-remittance of contributions and partial contribution remittances provide less retirement income in the RSA than the statutory contributory rate. These findings highlight a significant reduction in retirement income when pension contributions are not remitted on time, underscoring the critical importance of timely remittances in securing retirees' financial futures.
Sponsored Financial Research – Are Solicited Research Reports Positively Biased by Financial Analysts?
Presenter: Leonard Grebe (TU Darmstadt)
Authors: Marc Berninger (Tu Darmstadt), Leonard Grebe (TU Darmstadt), Dirk Schiereck (TU Darmstadt)
Discussant: Marc Deloof (Univ of Anterwerp)
Abstract: The increasing demand for transparency in financial markets has led to a rise in the need for financial research. Due to MiFID II, financial analysts are focussing mainly on the most relevant companies. Consequently, small and medium-sized companies struggle with analysts’ coverage and have to pay for financial research. This solicited research is widely used, but credibility can be seen critical by literature. Our findings underline that smaller firms with lower market capitalization are more likely to pay for sponsored research. Paid reports are more comprehensible and exhibit higher readability. However, the textual analysis does not detect divergences in the sentiment of both paid and unpaid reports. An event study shows that textual components can affect the capital market reaction on financial reports. But again, we cannot prove any differences between sponsored and non-sponsored research. The results suggest that paid financial research does not lack credibility and can be used as a powerful tool for SMEs.
Child Penalty and Intrahousehold Bargaining Power
Presenter: Leah Zimmerer (University of Mannheim)
Authors: Leah Zimmerer (University of Mannheim)
Discussant: Jean-Christophe Statnik (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Abstract: In this paper, I examine intrahousehold bargaining power as a potential explanation for the child penalty experienced by women and not by men. Following the birth of the first child, households are faced with the decision of selecting the primary caretaker, a choice that can result in reduced labor market participation and income. An important determinant influencing intrahousehold bargaining power is the relative income within the household. In Australia, 75% of women earn less than their partners. As a result, women with lower opportunity costs, on average, bear the cost of parenthood within the household. My results show that the child penalty for women who out-earn their partners is on average 50% smaller than for women who earn less than their partners. However, men do not even experience a child penalty when they earn less than their partners. I explore three different channels that might influence intrahousehold bargaining: conservative gender norms, paid parental leave regulations, and household responsibilities and external childcare provisions. My results highlight the importance of women’s intrahousehold bargaining power for women’s participation in the labor force.
Behavioral Finance II
Room: Room 502
Chair: Alice Bonaimé (Eller College of Management)
Stock price informativeness versus liquidity as determinants of subsequent financing choices
Presenter: Thi Xuan Dung Nguyen (Institute of Engineering (INP), University of Grenoble Alpes)
Authors: Thi Xuan Dung Nguyen (Institute of Engineering (INP), University of Grenoble Alpes), Radu Burlacu (Institute of Engineering (INP), University of Grenoble Alpes), Sonia Jimenez-Garces (Institute of Engineering (INP), University of Grenoble Alpes)
Discussant: Mikaël Petitjean (UcL)
Abstract: This paper investigates and compares the impact of stock price informativeness and liquidity following a Seasoned Equity Offering (SEO) on the firm’s subsequent choice between equity and debt financing on the European market over the period 2000-2017. We find that stock price informativeness and liquidity affect the subsequent financing choices following SEOs differently. Greater stock price informativeness around a given SEO leads to a higher propensity for subsequent equity financing but a lower propensity for subsequent debt financing in the following three years. The preference for equity financing over debt financing supports the market feedback hypothesis. In contrast, higher stock liquidity favors both sub-sequent equity and debt financing, with the propensity for debt issuance being higher. We also find evidence that stock liquidity is more predictive of the subsequent equity financing decision than stock price informativeness.
Lost in Transmission
Presenter: Marius Savatier (Paris Dauphine-PSL)
Authors: Marius Savatier (Paris Dauphine-PSL)
Discussant: Jean-Gabriel Cousin (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Abstract: In a novel examination of the Law of One Price, I investigate the transmission of market value between publicly-traded subsidiaries and their respective publicly-traded parent companies. On average, a $1 million increase in the parent's stake in a subsidiary leads to a mere $500 thousand increase in the parent company's market value. This result is obtained while holding all other stock market swings constant.
Pure momentum
Presenter: Xinyi Zhang (University of Warwick and CY Cergy Paris)
Authors: Xinyi Zhang (University of Warwick and CY Cergy Paris), Roberto Renò (ESSEC Business School), Roméo Tédongap (ESSEC Business School)
Discussant: Paolo MAZZA (IESEG School of Management)
Abstract: Momentum, one of the strongest and most comprehensively studied trading strategies, bets on the persistence of past trend. The trend is typically measured by the past cumulative returns of individual stocks and therefore the strategy is implemented by buying stocks with highest past returns and selling stocks with lowest past returns. However, the past cumulative return can be a noisy proxy for the past trend, especially for those stocks with high volatility. We apply a test to detect the presence of drift in the stock returns in the formation period eliminating the impact of volatility. We form our pure momentum portfolios based on the strength of the drift, which we argue is a more precise measure of trend. We find that our pure momentum strategies deliver significantly higher Sharpe ratio, higher Sortino ratio, lower volatility, less negative skewness, and lower kurtosis. Moreover, the strategy return is not fully spanned by the Fama-French five-factor model plus their momentum factor with abnormal returns significantly different from zero.
Green and Responsible Finance 2
Room: Room 503
Chair: Fredj Jawadi (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Environmental stigmatisation: a real threat to the fossil fuel industries? - A study of its financial consequences and adaptation strategies
Presenter: Marie Cellou (Université de Rennes)
Authors: Marie Cellou (Université de Rennes)
Discussant: Nihat Aktas (WHU)
Abstract: Over the last decade, the oil, gas, and mining industries have been stigmatised by climate activists, the scientific community and civil society for their contribution to global warming. But has this pressure had a significant impact on the financial and economic performance indicators of companies in these sectors? Through an empirical study carried out on a sample of 501 companies over fifteen years (2005 to 2020), we show that stigmatisation in the press has little significant impact on the financial and economic performance (ROE and ROA) of companies. However, we observe that the indicators are significantly degraded when stigmatisation increases, if the company is in a country that is highly exposed to physical climatic risks. It also appears that oil and gas companies are more sensitive to stigmatisation than mining companies. When these two conditions (oil companies and countries exposed to physical risks) are met, ROE and ROA indicators deteriorate significantly when stigmatisation increases. In this case, the diversification strategy makes it possible to deal with stigmatisation and seems to improve financial and economic returns.
A Missing Piece in the ESG Reporting Puzzle: A Lexicon-Based Study of Mandatory Disclosure Impacts in Vietnam
Presenter: Khanh-Linh Pham (Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orléans,Université d'Orléans)
Authors: Béatrice BOULU-RESHEF (Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orléans,Université d'Orléans), Matthieu Picault (Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orléans, Université d'Orléans), Khanh-Linh Pham (Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orléans,Université d'Orléans)
Discussant: Christophe Revelli (Kedge Business School)
Abstract: This study breaks new ground by deploying the first Vietnamese-specific lexicon for computing ESG scores using TF-IDF methodology, a significant stride in sustainability reporting research. It investigates the effects of Vietnam's 2015 mandatory Environmental and Social disclosure regulation on ESG reporting practices of Vietnam public firms and their subsequent impacts on firms' financial performance. We find that firms with strong ESG practices prior to the regulation experienced slower growth in ESG scores, while those with lower initial scores showed a significant increase, particularly in Social scores. Furthermore, although firms with high composite ESG scores pre-regulation showed improved firm valuation, this improvement was primarily driven by the Environmental and Governance components, rather than Social reporting. On the other hand, the improvement of firms’ ESG reporting practices also exhibited a significant deceleration in the volatility of stock return, shedding the lights on how the investors on Vietnam stock exchange perceive the change in firms’ managerial practices. By addressing this crucial gap in existing literature, our study not only highlights specific outcomes of mandatory ESG reporting in Vietnam but also presents an innovative methodological approach with wide-ranging implications for economic policy and investment strategies within emerging markets. This evidence supports the need of considering the specific context and characteristics of emerging markets, such as Vietnam, when implementing ESG reporting regulations.
Behavioral Finance III
Room: Room 505
Chair: Jean-François Gajewski (University Jean Moulin Lyon 3, IAELyon, Magellan)
The Nexus Between Market Signals and Managers' Behaviour Empirical Evidence from Mergers and Acquisitions in Vietnam
Presenter: Duy Tuan NGUYEN (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Authors: Duy Tuan NGUYEN (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Discussant: Sebastien Dereeper (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Abstract: Our study examines the relationship between market signals and managerial behaviour in the context of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) through the empirical testing of two hypotheses: the signal hypothesis and the learning hypothesis. Additionally, we evaluate the market reaction with the M&A announcement and the information consequences of M&A deals. By employing event study methodology in our estimation, we provide empirical evidence supporting the idea that stock market reaction is more intense with small control deals. Moreover, if market react positively on M&A deal, it could help increase the level stock price informativeness in post-announcement period. However, empirical analysis does not confirm the signal and learning hypothesis, but the firms’ ownership plays some role on the completion of M&A deals. In conclusion, our research remarks the need to enhance the transparency and efficiency of Vietnam stock market.
Do Concerns for Risks of Personal Data Leaks Impact Decision-Making in Finance?
Presenter: Mehdi Louafi (Université d'Orléans)
Authors: Mehdi Louafi (Université d'Orléans)
Discussant: Jessica Fouilloux-Thomasset (University of Bordeaux)
Stock market reaction to corporate green bond issuance: Evidence from Western Europe
Presenter: Meriem Tourani (Université de Rennes)
Authors: Meriem Tourani (Université de Rennes)
Discussant: Philippe DUPUY (Grenoble Ecole Management)
Abstract: This study investigates the stock market reaction to the announcements of corporate green bond issuance in 18 countries of Western Europe between 2014 and 2023. Using 361 green bond announcements issued by 136 unique and listed issuers, we find a negative stock market reaction to issuance. Specifically, results show negative and significant cumulative abnormal returns in a two-day window including the day of announcement and the day following it. This effect is particularly present for repeated issuances of green bonds. Furthermore, both green bond issuances and conventional bond issuances generate a negative market reaction. These results suggest that green bond issuance signals negative or unfavorable information to market investors about the issuing company.
Credit and counterparty risk
Room: Room 506
Chair: Christophe Pérignon (HEC)
Collateralization, Monitoring, and Credit Reallocation
Presenter: Tong Zhao (KU Leuven)
Authors: Tong Zhao (KU Leuven)
Discussant: Franck Moraux (Université de Rennes and CREM)
Abstract: This paper studies how lenders' ability to monitor collateral and mitigate frictions in collateralization affect credit outcomes. Exploiting law reforms that subject collateral monitoring to information asymmetries, I show that such reforms trigger credit reallocation from foreign to domestic lenders. Following the legal change, the moral hazard in monitoring collateral by foreign lenders increases. In response, foreign lenders decrease loan issuance and acceptance of movable collateral from treated firms, while increasing the use of covenants. The reallocation effects translate into a reduction in firms' employment and net income in the post-period. These results highlight the importance of friction associated with collateralization in shaping credit markets.
Impact of State Guaranteed Loans in France on financial statements during Covid-19 crisis
Presenter: Constantin FOREAU (Université Grenoble Alpes, CERAG / Coface, Data Lab)
Authors: Constantin FOREAU (Université Grenoble Alpes, CERAG / Coface, Data Lab)
Discussant: Gael Imad Eddine (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Abstract: This paper analyses the effects of French state-guaranteed loans on financial statements and corporate default risk using a difference-in-differences method. The COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted the global economy. As a result, most governments launched an unprecedented range of temporary credit and tax deferral programs. The French program enabled companies to benefit from these without any size or sector limitation. Prior crisis, the study shows that companies participating in the program have lower cash flow, higher debt and hold more cash. Using a unique dataset, we show one year after crisis that companies participating in the program increased their debt, cash and working capital more than others. This increase was reduced by a third a year later, indicating a partial debt repayment. We note that companies participating in the state guaranteed loan program have been more negatively affected by Covid-19 but have become more liquid as a result of the loan. Using default scores, we find that firms taking state-guaranteed loans already had a higher bankruptcy risk of default than others, and the risk of default increased after subscribing to the state-guaranteed loan.
MODÉLISATION DE LA PROBABILITE DE DEFAUT DES PME
Presenter: Victor-manuel de fabritus (INP paris)
Authors: Victor-manuel de fabritus (INP paris), Rémy Estran (edhec)
Discussant: Ludovic Vigneron (IAE Lille University School of Management)
Abstract: The objective of this paper is to set up a credit scoring model to assess the credit risk of international SMEs. Regardless of the stakeholders of the firms, company owners, employees, commercial partners, lenders, or investors, the default prediction is a highly important matter for both internal and external company’s counterparties. However, this subject has been little addressed in academic research. Therefore, we developed a model to predict those defaults. Resulting from a multivariate logistic regression, the proposed model takes into account several risk factors (activity, liquidity, solvency, coverage, leverage) that can lead to the company’s default. It was estimated on a sample of 288291 companies and over a period from 2002 to 2018, of which 579 defaulted, i.e. a default rate of 0.20%. Its performance was evaluated on 123552 others. The originality and interest of this study lies in the recency of the data used, the large size of its sample and its specific focus on international SMEs. The discriminating power measured by the accuracy ratio of the model is 80.5%.
12:00 - 13:00
"Writing Advice for PhD students" by Professor Alice Bonaimé learn more
"Writing Advice for PhD students" by Professor Alice Bonaimé
Room: Amphi 556